2009
DOI: 10.3758/app.71.8.1916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating a model of global psychophysical judgments for brightness: I. Behavioral properties of summations and productions

Abstract: ) proposed psychophysical theory of loudness and found it substantially supported. The aim of the present research is to begin an extension of this research to brightness. Luce's (2002Luce's ( , 2004 theory deals with the global percept of subjective intensity, in which there is a psychophysical function that maps pairs of physical intensities onto positive real numbers and represents, in an explicit mathematical way, subjective summation and a form of ratio production. These representations derive from a numb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The test set included rods of various materials and diameters, whereas the training set consisted only of wooden 1 The use of visual information is prone to individual differences (see Withagen & van Wermeskerken, 2009, for an example specific to visual feedback in dynamic touch) and nonlinearities (e.g., Steingrimsson, 2009;Stevens, 1957), both of which are at odds with conventional significance testing for mean differences (Dixon, 2005;Green & Luce, 1974;. It would be premature to compound, with two kinds of feedback, the variability due to multiple kinds of feedback before we have a better understanding of transfer in general (i.e., irrespective of accuracy).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test set included rods of various materials and diameters, whereas the training set consisted only of wooden 1 The use of visual information is prone to individual differences (see Withagen & van Wermeskerken, 2009, for an example specific to visual feedback in dynamic touch) and nonlinearities (e.g., Steingrimsson, 2009;Stevens, 1957), both of which are at odds with conventional significance testing for mean differences (Dixon, 2005;Green & Luce, 1974;. It would be premature to compound, with two kinds of feedback, the variability due to multiple kinds of feedback before we have a better understanding of transfer in general (i.e., irrespective of accuracy).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luce (2004) and Steingrimsson (2009) are contemporary examples. The present application, however, entails nonnumerical representation.…”
Section: Psychophysics and Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Triangles and circles refer to the smallest and largest standard differences suggests that participants could also have the ability to directly evaluate ratios of brightness differences. Indeed, the ability to evaluate ratios of sensory differences is assumed in several current models of the rating response with end anchors (Masin & Busetto, 2010) and in recent studies of brightness judgment (Steingrimsson, 2009(Steingrimsson, , 2011. The following experiment was designed to test the existence of this ability for brightness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%