2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating accidents in the offshore drilling of petroleum: Regional picture and reducing impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is evident for example from work by [Cha 2014]. A language problem or a language barrier are mentioned also in others works [Ismail 2014;Paul 2013;Guldenmund 2013]. These authors mentioned the language problem as one of the factors influencing the risk of an accident at work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It is evident for example from work by [Cha 2014]. A language problem or a language barrier are mentioned also in others works [Ismail 2014;Paul 2013;Guldenmund 2013]. These authors mentioned the language problem as one of the factors influencing the risk of an accident at work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In spite of many applied precaution systems ocean engineering structures may undergo failures [1,2]. The main causes of the failures are the following: corrosion wear, collisions with vessels, excessive operational loads, material defects, fatigue of materials, improper construction as well as workmanship [3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Tab1 Grades Of Steels Applicable To Pipelines Acc Api 5l mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literary overview From a literary overview results that the quantification of the probability of occurrence of the error by the user is mainly addressed with in the nuclear field [4][5][6], where a possible error could cause very serious consequences of an extremely large number of people. Nevertheless, studies concerning HRA can be found also in the Industrial Process [7,8] Avionics [9,10], Railway [11,12] and Healthcare fields [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Regarding this context field the main HRA-techniques used are: FTA, FMEA/FMECA, THERP, RCA CREAM, HCR and TESEO but there is no one study that concerns the evaluation of human reliability in the specific use of medical devices.…”
Section: Of Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like "level 8" but operator workload is incompatible with available time 10 Emergency activities, serious impact on patient, workload is incompatible with available time Low probability that the operator undergoes damage [4][5] Real chance that the operator undergoes damage [6][7][8] High probability that the operator undergoes damage 9-10 Inevitable exposure to one or more risk (see 3 rd parameter description to know possible risks) The environmental conditions incompatible with the activities, possible vibration or noise, the operator could work and use the device during night-shift Very complex procedural and/or organizational managements are required. Same activities are not managed, coordinated, planned and controlled in an appropriate manner 10 Very complex procedural and/or organizational managements are required.…”
Section: O: Occurrence Factormentioning
confidence: 99%