2014
DOI: 10.1093/comjnl/bxu055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating and Comparing Fault-Based Testing Strategies for General Boolean Specifications: A Series of Experiments

Abstract: A great amount of fault-based testing strategies have been proposed to generate test cases for detecting certain types of faults in Boolean specifications. However, most of the previous studies on these strategies were focused on the Boolean expressions in the disjunctive normal form, even the irredundant disjunctive normal form -little work has been conducted to comprehensively investigate their performance on general Boolean specifications. In this study, we conducted a series of experiments to evaluate and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fault-based approach has also been widely applied into the test case selection based on Boolean specifications, cf. [25].…”
Section: Human-oriented Fault-based Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fault-based approach has also been widely applied into the test case selection based on Boolean specifications, cf. [25].…”
Section: Human-oriented Fault-based Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, mutation patterns may be undetected for each type of fault in a general Boolean expression. Sun et al [10] evaluated and compared 18 fault-based testing strategies by means of a series of experiments, using more than 4000 randomly generated fault-based general Boolean expressions. Their experiments showed that the family of fault-based testing strategies, such as the MUMCUT, would usually provide the best performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%