2022
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddac186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating and implementing block jackknife resampling Mendelian randomization to mitigate bias induced by overlapping samples

Abstract: Participant overlap can induce overfitting bias into Mendelian randomization (MR) and polygenic risk score (PRS) studies. Here, we evaluated a block jackknife resampling framework for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and PRS construction to mitigate overfitting bias in MR analyses and implemented this study design in a causal inference setting using data from the UK Biobank.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the block jackknife resampling framework requires access to individual-level phenotype and genotype data that we did not have a good way to evaluate. [42] Population overlapping could increase the possibility of false positives, but it was unlikely to affect our conclusion for our negative results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Meanwhile, the block jackknife resampling framework requires access to individual-level phenotype and genotype data that we did not have a good way to evaluate. [42] Population overlapping could increase the possibility of false positives, but it was unlikely to affect our conclusion for our negative results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Genetic IVs in a MR setting are conventionally selected from an independent dataset where the sample does not overlap with the dataset being analysed (53). This is to avoid overfitting bias.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although summary statistics from GWAS of both sepsis [ 24 ] and HDL subclass measures [ 70 ] are available already, the largest samples (by an order of magnitude) are in UK Biobank, leading to sample overlap in the exposure and outcome datasets, which leads to “winners curse”, biasing estimates [ 55 , 71 ]. In order to maximise sample size while reducing overfitting, we performed a sensitivity analysis using block jacknife resampling [ 72 ]. We split UK Biobank into multiple blocks using a block jacknife approach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure outcomes in the remaining ~ 260,000 participants, we used a block resampling approach [ 72 ]. To do this we split this group into ten further samples, each with around 26,000 participants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%