2010
DOI: 10.2753/mer1052-8008200302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating and Motivating Faculty Performance: Challenges for Marketing Chairs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Academic institutions often allow faculty to influence their inner workings through faculty governance and department and university-level service work (Honeycutt, et al, 2010). Additionally, nursing faculty should have an impact on their program and department through course development, curricular revision, and assessment of program outcomes (NLN, 2005).…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Academic institutions often allow faculty to influence their inner workings through faculty governance and department and university-level service work (Honeycutt, et al, 2010). Additionally, nursing faculty should have an impact on their program and department through course development, curricular revision, and assessment of program outcomes (NLN, 2005).…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholarship may include establishing programs of research to serve as mentoring opportunities for doctoral students to develop their own programs of research, such as via the National Institutes of Health (NIH) T32 National Research Service Award (NRSA) funding mechanism (Dixon et al, 2007). Faculty service activities include serving on department or university committees, or other unpaid professional volunteer activities, such as leadership positions at scholarly conferences (Honeycutt, et al, 2010).…”
Section: Table 4 Factor Matrix Of the Maximum Likelihood Oblique 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the limited research regarding the ethnic and gender balance of the marketing professoriate, Aggarwal, Rochford, and Vaidyanathan (2008) indicate that marketing department head positions are “typically headed by a White male who is a full professor and has been serving as a chair for the last 5.5 years” (p. 44). Neither Shepherd, Carley, and Stuart (2008) nor Honeycutt, Thelen, and Ford (2010) report the gender of the 132 and 109 marketing department chairs in their respective samples. As Beddoes and Schimpf (2018) suggest, most literature surrounding department heads is gender-blind (i.e., environments wherein the dominant majority maintain their privilege by denying that they are privileged) or assumes that definitions of fairness and collective good are not institutional and male-centric even when they are.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, educators needed to determine their performance indicators in terms of teaching effectiveness and/or research productivity. Honeycutt et al (2010) felt that "teaching and research performance importance levels differed based on institutional mission and the Chairs allocated different priorities to faculty member service activities based on mission" (p. 203).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%