1994
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1994.1004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating and Validating Two Methods for Estimating Brain Structure Volumes: Tessellation and Simple Pixel Counting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thereafter, the non-zero intensity voxels were automatically counted. The cerebral volume was calculated by multiplying the total voxel counts by the voxel volume (25). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereafter, the non-zero intensity voxels were automatically counted. The cerebral volume was calculated by multiplying the total voxel counts by the voxel volume (25). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial image processing to register and align the T1 and PD/T2 scans into a standardized plane was conducted with BRAINS2 software (University of Iowa, Iowa City). [27][28][29][30][31][32][33] All of the scans were registered along an anteroposterior commissure axis. For a small number of scans with suboptimal PD/T2 scan quality, a fitinterleave correction using BRAINS2 was also performed.…”
Section: Image Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a fourth study, we took advantage of advances in MR technology and software development to obtain measurements more empirically and efficiently. Using the locally developed software Brain Research Analysis of Images Networks and Systems (BRAINS) (Cohen et al 1992; Andreasen et al 1993, 1994 b ; Arndt et al 1994; Cizadlo et al 1994), we transformed all brains into the same stereotactic space, using a 6-point linear transformation. We then produced an image of an “average schizophrenic brain” and an “average normal brain,” and then subtracted the two average brains from one another and displayed the result as an effect size map.…”
Section: Nodes Of the Cognitive Dysmetria Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%