1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8191(97)00011-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating approximately balanced parity-declustered data layouts for disk arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their depth is k(v − 1). • Randomized Permutation Layouts (RPL): These data layouts modify a randomized construction due to Schwabe, Sutherland, and Holmer [19]. They can be constructed for any v and k, and satisfy Conditions 1, 2, 4, and 6.…”
Section: Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Their depth is k(v − 1). • Randomized Permutation Layouts (RPL): These data layouts modify a randomized construction due to Schwabe, Sutherland, and Holmer [19]. They can be constructed for any v and k, and satisfy Conditions 1, 2, 4, and 6.…”
Section: Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tradeoff of additional redundant space for reduced failure recovery time can be achieved using a technique called parity declustering, in which the stripe size k is chosen to be smaller than the array size v. Parity-declustered data layouts have been considered by, among others, Muntz and Lui [12], Holland and Gibson [10], Stockmeyer [20], Schwabe and Sutherland [16,18], Schwabe, Sutherland, and Holmer [19], Alvarez, Burkhard, and Cristian [1], and Alvarez, Burkhard, Stockmeyer, and Cristian [2].…”
Section: Data Layouts For Disk Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation