2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2011.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating asset pricing models in the Korean stock market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
14
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
14
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this conclusion is slightly different with the previous observation [37] that reports a simple negative correlation between return and market capitalization. The composition of the KOSPI 200 is one of the reasons for the discrepancy.…”
Section: Market Capitalization and Size Portfoliocontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this conclusion is slightly different with the previous observation [37] that reports a simple negative correlation between return and market capitalization. The composition of the KOSPI 200 is one of the reasons for the discrepancy.…”
Section: Market Capitalization and Size Portfoliocontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…When the expected return is positive, the large companies outperform the small companies. If it is negative, the small firms are preferred for generating revenues and it is well-matched to the prior observation in Kim et al [37].…”
Section: Market Capitalization and Size Portfoliosupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, when size and book-to-market factors are included in the CAPM, the empirical findings sound better. Kim, Kim and Shin (2012) compare the CAPM; APT motivated model (FF5 is constructed by adding liquidity factor and long-term reversal factors to Fama-French three factor model); the Consumption based CAPM; Intertemporal CAPM and Conditional CAPM. The findings support FF5 as most satisfactorily among the models considered in the study.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, stocks price did not reflect the intrinsic value of a company; conventional valuation models failed to estimate the stocks' price. Besides, although stocks price as well as equity value resulting from company valuation models have been popular in international academics and practice (Pereiro 2006, Kim 2012, Vietnamese companies and practitioners have remained in the first stage of company valuation understandings. For example, most of the Vietnamese research papers studied the traditional Capital Asset Pricing Model (Sharpe 1964, Lintner 1965, Black 1972) while its basic assumptions could not be held in emerging securities markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pereiro (2005) showed that different CAPM-based versions including G-CAPM, L-CAPM, AH-CAPM were used in calculating the cost of equity in Argentina with benchmark being US securities market. Other research used CAPM methods to estimate the cost of equity based on local factors: Bruner and Chan (2002) used four CAPM-related models to estimate the cost of equity of large firms in Brazil, South Africa, Thailand, Malaysia and Poland; Kim (2012) considered and compared between CAPM methods to price assets in Korean stock market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%