2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2021.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Auricular Point Acupressure for Chronic Low Back Pain Self-Management Using Technology: A Feasibility Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, one study that was not a clinical study, five studies that did not use self-acupressure, seven studies that did not combine ICTs with self-acupressure, and two studies that used the same data as published journal articles (conference abstracts) were excluded. Finally, 12 studies [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] were included in this review (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Among them, one study that was not a clinical study, five studies that did not use self-acupressure, seven studies that did not combine ICTs with self-acupressure, and two studies that used the same data as published journal articles (conference abstracts) were excluded. Finally, 12 studies [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] were included in this review (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 12 included studies were published between 2018 and 2021. In terms of study design, five RCTs [20,[23][24][25]28], three pilot studies with one group [22,27,30], two RCT protocols [26,31], one focus group and online survey [21], and one qualitative study [29] were included. Among the included studies, the rationale for four studies [25,[28][29][30] was the COVID-19 era (4/12, 33.33%).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our interdisciplinary team has conducted several trials and accumulated significant evidence for chronic pain reduction using APA compared to sham APA. Our team demonstrated the following: (1) significant rapid and sustained effects on pain-related outcomes—APA resulted in rapid pain relief (≥38% three minutes post-APA [ 42 , 43 ]) with >44% pain relief and >28% improved physical function at follow-up after 4 weeks of APA [ 35 , 44 49 ]; (2) reduced use of pain medications—after 4 weeks of APA, ≥60% of participants reported less use of pain medications [ 35 , 50 ]; (3) similar effectiveness between interventionist-administered vs. self-administered APA—we developed a self-guided, mobile-enabled APA application (app) to allow patients to self-administer APA[51]. After 4 weeks, 26 users showed an average reduction of 46% in pain intensity and 31% in pain interference [ 51 ]; and (4) successful integration of APA into a major healthcare system in real-world clinical practice [ 43 , 52 ]—patients who received APA by trained nurses achieved 71% pain reduction post-48 hours of APA [ 43 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%