2022
DOI: 10.1002/edn3.269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating bioinformatics pipelines for population‐level inference using environmental DNA

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metabarcoding data consist of counts of unique DNA sequences detected by a DNA sequencing platform (e.g., for a given sample we might observe three copies of sequence A, 1001 copies of sequence B, etc.). Important bioinformatic decisions bear on how multiple sequences are combined to represent species or genera or higher taxonomic groups (Macé et al, 2022), but the resulting data themselves are counts of reads associated with particular taxa for each sample. Many uses of these data in an ecological setting share an (often implicit) assumption that the reads emerging from DNA sequences are an accurate depiction of the sample composition prior to amplification (e.g., Laporte et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metabarcoding data consist of counts of unique DNA sequences detected by a DNA sequencing platform (e.g., for a given sample we might observe three copies of sequence A, 1001 copies of sequence B, etc.). Important bioinformatic decisions bear on how multiple sequences are combined to represent species or genera or higher taxonomic groups (Macé et al, 2022), but the resulting data themselves are counts of reads associated with particular taxa for each sample. Many uses of these data in an ecological setting share an (often implicit) assumption that the reads emerging from DNA sequences are an accurate depiction of the sample composition prior to amplification (e.g., Laporte et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for a given sample we might observe 3 copies of sequence A, 1001 copies of sequence B, etc.). Important bioinformatic decisions bear on how multiple sequences are combined to represent species or genera or higher taxonomic groups (Macé et al 2022), but the resulting data themselves are straightforward counts of reads associated with particular taxa for each sample. Many uses of these data in an ecological setting share an (often implicit) assumption that the reads emerging from DNA sequencers are an accurate depiction of the sample composition prior to amplification (e.g., Laporte et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergent field of eDNA‐based population genetics could have a great potential to study fish population connectivity across depths (Adams et al, 2019). For instance, eDNA has been recently used to investigate diversity within populations of Striped red mullet ( Mullus surmuletus ; e.g., Macé et al, 2022), or Blackfoot pāua ( Haliotis iris ; Adams et al, 2022), and to successfully estimate population genetic differentiation like for the whale shark (Sigsgaard et al, 2016). Only through standard, sustained and multi‐objectives observations at all depths we could get the insights needed to understand the fundamental ecological processes that govern the dynamics of marine ecosystems, and design depth‐specific strategies to effectively protect them in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%