2015
DOI: 10.1002/jid.3124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating CCTs from a Gender Perspective: The Impact of Chile Solidario on Women's Employment Prospect

Abstract: This paper examines the effects of Chile Solidario programme on labour market outcomes from a gender perspective. Chile Solidario was implemented as the main anti-poverty programme in Chile in 2002. The purpose of this conditional cash transfer is to provide poor families with auxiliary social services, including support for employment. We compare the gender impact of Chile Solidario using difference-in-differences and regression discontinuity design estimations based on data from the Chile Solidario Panel Sur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As women are put in charge of household welfare, this framework perpetuates the male privilege of being absolved from any clearly defined role (Staab, 2010;Tabbush, 2010) and contributes to entrenching asymmetric gender norms, values and stereotypes (Branisa et al, 2014;Cook and Razavi, 2012;Folbre, 2009;Seguino, 2007). The experience of conditional cash transfers implemented in the Latin American context is at the core of these critiques (Bradshaw, 2008;Chant, 2008;Scarlato et al, 2016;Staab, 2010;Tabbush, 2010) 7 . However, the concerns about the risk that cash transfers may reinforce the traditional role of women as mothers, with primary responsibility for family care, without taking into account their particular needs and vulnerabilities can be easily extended to the case of unconditional cash transfers implemented in other developing contexts (Ghosh, 2011).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As women are put in charge of household welfare, this framework perpetuates the male privilege of being absolved from any clearly defined role (Staab, 2010;Tabbush, 2010) and contributes to entrenching asymmetric gender norms, values and stereotypes (Branisa et al, 2014;Cook and Razavi, 2012;Folbre, 2009;Seguino, 2007). The experience of conditional cash transfers implemented in the Latin American context is at the core of these critiques (Bradshaw, 2008;Chant, 2008;Scarlato et al, 2016;Staab, 2010;Tabbush, 2010) 7 . However, the concerns about the risk that cash transfers may reinforce the traditional role of women as mothers, with primary responsibility for family care, without taking into account their particular needs and vulnerabilities can be easily extended to the case of unconditional cash transfers implemented in other developing contexts (Ghosh, 2011).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medeiros et al (2008) reveal that the program Bolsa Familia in Brazil reduced the probability of labor participation among eligible women. Similarly, Ferro and Nicollela (2007), Teixeira (2010), and Scarlato et al (2014) find that some CCT programs have implied a decline in hours worked by women, in particular those with greater restrictions to meet the requirements of these policies and with less assistance from other household members in domestic tasks. Accordingly, Gammage (2010) sets forth the importance to consider the potential incidence of these programs on women time distribution between unpaid domestic activities and labor market participation.…”
Section: Literature and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Resulta probable que las madres internalicen que son las perceptoras de un ingreso que reciben para el cuidado y atención de sus hijos, y eso las exima de participar en el mercado de trabajo. En este sentido, Scarlato et al (2014) resaltan la importancia de equilibrar el sesgo que existe hacia las mujeres en la asignación de las responsabilidades introducidas por estas políticas, con el propósito de no afectar la inclusión de las mismas en el mercado de trabajo ni el fortalecimiento de sus capacidades laborales. Castillo et al (2013) destacan que estos programas han reforzado el rol de la mujer como principal proveedora del cuidado infantil, lo cual puede ser positivo en ciertos aspectos aunque pone en riesgo la perpetuación de los roles tradicionalmente asignadas a las mismas y su "aislamiento al ámbito doméstico".…”
Section: Antecedentesunclassified