2013
DOI: 10.1109/tii.2012.2219063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Combined Load Forecasting in Large Power Systems and Smart Grids

Abstract: We present here a combined aggregative short-term load forecasting method for smart grids, a novel methodology that allows to obtain a global prognosis by summing up the forecasts on the compounding individual loads. More accurately, we detail here three new approaches, namely bottom-up aggregation (with and without bias correction), top-down aggregation (with and without bias correction), and regressive aggregation. Further, we have devised an experiment to compare their results, evaluating them with two data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, another n apa particles meeting the requirements will be randomly added. According to Equation (28), n pa particles are selected from the n pa + n apa particles based on the affinity and concentration of antibody and antigen.…”
Section: Implementation Steps Of Forecast Model Weight Determination mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, another n apa particles meeting the requirements will be randomly added. According to Equation (28), n pa particles are selected from the n pa + n apa particles based on the affinity and concentration of antibody and antigen.…”
Section: Implementation Steps Of Forecast Model Weight Determination mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exponential smoothing method reported by Weron et al [23], the gray forecast method reported by Li et al [24] based on time trend extrapolation reported by Ismail et al [25], the clustering forecast method reported by Kodogiannis et al [26] and multiple regression analysis method reported by Hong et al [27] based on the load related factor analysis cannot ensure the satisfactory result in any case. In order to make full use of the advantages and the contained information of each single forecast model, combination forecast [28][29][30][31][32][33] is an effective method. The question of how to determine the weight assignment of single forecast method is a difficult point in combination forecasting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Model Combination: another option is to group all the predictions issued by the forecasters in order to build a more robust forecast. We have addressed this strategy in [13,32].…”
Section: Data Distribution Service (Dds)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tables also contain an estimation of the expected value of the error for every dataset under the hypothesis that ε follows a Gaussian Random Variable (column Expected MAPE), which according to our experiments is a fair assumption. Please note that in [32] we present a detailed description of the estimation process. Moreover, some TSOs publish their own STLF so we can calculate their error in the same way as with our predictions.…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, single predicting model to forecast PV output power has its characteristics, drawbacks and forecasting problems. Combination forecasting is an effective way to improve prediction accuracy by making full use of the contained information of each single forecast model [13], [14]. The issue of how to determine the weight of single forecast method is a difficult point in combination forecasting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%