Evaluating community participation: A comparison of participatory approaches in the planning and implementation of new primary health‐care services in northern Australia

Abstract

Community participation is increasingly seen as a prerequisite for more acceptable and sustainable health services. It is difficult to evaluate the extent of participation in health planning and implementation of services, and there are limited tools available to assist in evaluating such processes. Our paper reports on community participation as part of the implementation of 2 primary health programs in regional north Queensland, Australia. We define community participation as collective involvement of people, including consultation, from a community of place or interest in aspects of health service development. We pragmatically evaluate and compare the extent of participation by using a framework developed by Rifkin and colleagues in 1988 and subsequently refined. Data collected from the implementation of each program were analyzed and ranked on a spidergram against 5 process indicators: needs assessment, leadership, resource mobilization, management, and organization. Community participation was found to vary across the programs but was most extensive in both programs in identifying need and potential solutions. Both programs demonstrated high levels of integration of the implementation of health programs with preexisting community structures. Involving local communities in genuine opportunities in managing the programs and mobilizing resources was more challenging. Key differences emerged in the people involved in the programs, the settings and frameworks used to facilitate implementation. We conclude that Rifkin's process indicators are a useful starting point for assessing community participation, particularly for health planners who are required to include participatory approaches when planning and implementing services. We suggest areas that require further consideration.

Conselho de saúde e efetividade participativa: estudo sobre avaliação de desempenho

“…Com base na sistematização dessas dimensões e da avaliação dos seus respectivos indicadores é possível medir, localizar e representar visualmente os níveis de desempenho da participação em saúde 24 . O spidergram tem sido utilizado em diversas experiências internacionais para avaliar a efetividade das instâncias de participação em diversos contextos 24,25,26,27 .…”

WOmen's Action for Mums and Bubs (WOMB) Trial Protocol: A Non-randomized Stepped Wedge Implementation Trial of Participatory Women's Groups to Improve the Health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mothers and Children in Australia

“…The RSF framework guides the PWG intervention planning and implementation process (37). The RSF uses a semistructured approach to identifying needs, planning interventions, and implementation by community people in partnership with health professionals with monitoring via a series of workshops (38). This approach has recently been tested in Australian rural communities in improving oral health care, and found to be feasible when used with skilled facilitation (38)(39)(40).…”

Health system redesign: Changing thoughts, values, and behaviours for the co‐production of a safety culture

“…Additionally, there is recognition to achieve this end; it is necessary to engage stakeholders, including frontline clinicians, patients, community representatives, policy makers, and academics, in the whole change process. 16,17 The need for stakeholder participation arises from the fact that system drivers of service reconfiguration include cost, quality, access, technology, and workforce. 18 Each stakeholder provides an important and unique perspective with regard to these, as they contribute to the safety culture of the organisation.…”