2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Computational and Structural Approaches to Predict Transformation Products of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Abstract: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) undergo transformation reactions with atmospheric photochemical oxidants, such as hydroxyl radicals (OH•), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and ozone (O 3 ). The most common PAH-transformation products (PAH-TPs) are nitrated-, oxygenated-, and hydroxylated-PAHs (NPAHs, OPAHs, and OHPAHs, respectively), some of which are known to pose potential human health concerns. We sampled four theoretical approaches for predicting the location of reactive sites on PAHs (i.e., the carbon where… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 173 publications
(278 reference statements)
5
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the central ring of 6 is 2.5-fold lower than that of the terminal rings [ 52 ], which can be pictured best by Clar’s aromatic π-sextet approach drawing resonance structures with the highest number of π-sextet rings ( Figure S15 ) [ 53 ]. These aromaticity calculations are roughly in agreement with the reactive position of various PAH compounds identified by different prediction methods as well as laboratory data summarised by Cheong et al [ 54 ]. They clearly identified position 9 of both 5 and 6 as the most reactive.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, the central ring of 6 is 2.5-fold lower than that of the terminal rings [ 52 ], which can be pictured best by Clar’s aromatic π-sextet approach drawing resonance structures with the highest number of π-sextet rings ( Figure S15 ) [ 53 ]. These aromaticity calculations are roughly in agreement with the reactive position of various PAH compounds identified by different prediction methods as well as laboratory data summarised by Cheong et al [ 54 ]. They clearly identified position 9 of both 5 and 6 as the most reactive.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The presence of 18 as a product of the biotransformation of 5 follows the trend of the laboratory data of Cheong et al [ 54 ], although the formation of 16 as the main product with hydroxylation on the terminal ring suggests that activity can be explained here by the predicted aromaticity ( Figure S15 ). For compounds 3 and 4 , the neighbouring carbon to that in the compound’s bay area (positions 4 and 3, respectively) was classified as the preferred reactive site by laboratory data [ 54 ], and was hence in disagreement with the regioselectivity observed here. Instead, the prediction with Mulliken and the predicted carbon with the lowest hydroxylated PAH adduct stability could explain the product formation catalysed by CYP5035S7.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ozonolysis of aromatic compounds can lead to different substitutions on the PAH rings 3634 . Thermodynamic calculations suggest that an OH adduction is favorable over carbonyl adductions due to the highly instable epoxide intermediates, both resulting in low-volatility products 37 . PHE ozonolysis has previously been measured to form 2'-formyl[1,1'biphenyl]-2-carboxylate (2'F(1-1'BP)2C) in laboratory studies of PHE bound to the surface of silica particles 22 .…”
Section: Phenanthrenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction of reactive site C6 can also be confirmed by the Clar’s aromatic π-sextet approach. 26 The following calculated potential energy surfaces (PESs) of the reaction between • OH and BaP also support this prediction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%