Evaluating Consistency in Environmental Policy Mixes through Policy, Stakeholder, and Contextual Interactions

Abstract

This paper introduces a method to analyse and explore consistency within policy mixes in order to support the policymaking cycle and applies it to energy and climate change policies in the United Kingdom (UK) biofuels policy context. The first part of the paper introduces a multi-level method to evaluate consistency within policy mixes implemented over a period of time. The first level explores consistency across policy design features in policy mixes. The second level evaluates how stakeholders, and their interactions with policy instruments and each other, can impact consistency within a given context. These interactions influence the implementation of policies and can lead to unintended outcomes that fail to meet the overarching goals. In the second part of the paper, we apply our method to the UK biofuels policy mix, to explore a sector that cuts across the policy areas of transportation, energy, land-use, air, and climate change. Our analysis demonstrates how, by overlooking complex interactions in the design and implementation of policies in the biofuels sector, policy mixes have conflicted with the development of a potential low-carbon technology.

Drivers and risks for renewable energy developments in mountain regions: a case of a pilot photovoltaic project in the Swiss Alps

“…They also think that the financing activities, such as the sale of certificates and crowdfunding, and the test installation was successful for the PV project [7,14]. Their driver in the project was to produce renewable electricity in the village, and they agreed with the nuclear phase out [17,28]. These drivers are in line with the aims of the energy strategy.…”

“…For these reasons, we contend that aggregate PV goals are not met due to barriers that stop individual projects from going forward. Some of these barriers may stem from inconsistent implementation of support policies [17]. Understanding the decision process at a project level is therefore necessary to clarify the lack of success of energy policies to reach the planned goals [18], and it allows us to determine risks to implementation of individual renewables projects and aggregate goals.…”

“…The first step consists in the collection of information (intelligence), followed by the creation of agreement on what to do (promotion). This requires clarity on which groups benefit and which values are promoted by each alternative, in order to avoid unintended outcomes [17]. These two steps should be done before clarifying and setting down the goals, norms, and instruments to be used (codification).…”

Sustainability of a Policy Instrument: Rethinking the Renewable Portfolio Standard in South Korea

“…The role of scholars and practitioners in the energy field is to find the most appropriate instrument to achieve the two competing values of boosting the economy and protecting the environment. The importance of selecting a policy instrument or mixing instruments will increase [45,86]. More debates and research should be conducted to arouse interest in the theme of sustainable energy policy instruments.…”

Policy design dynamics: fitting goals and instruments in transport infrastructure planning in the Netherlands

“…Recent studies have described how the embeddedness of policy designs causes their development to be susceptible to the influences of the political, administrative and legal institutional context (e.g. Howlett and Rayner 2004;Howlett 2014a;Rogge and Reichardt 2016;Bahn-Walkowiak and Wilts 2017;Falcone et al 2017;Rayner et al 2017;Lieu et al 2018). The institutional context influences the formulation process of design elements and their alignment (Flanagan et al 2011;Chindarkar et al 2017).…”