2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459x.2011.00333.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Consumer Acceptance Tests by Three-Way Internal Preference Mapping Obtained by Parallel Factor Analysis (Parafac)

Abstract: In this work, it is demonstrated that consumer acceptance analysis can be evaluated by simultaneously considering several attributes using a three-way internal preference map obtained by parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC). Considerations regarding the building of this three-way map by PARAFAC are reported. Pilot case studies with real data sets from herb cakes and beef burgers are also carried out, and comparisons with results from regular internal preference maps are obtained by principal component analysis. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
92
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
92
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The i × m portion was the same for each i × j portion of the individual matrices. PARAFAC procedures and the construction of a 3-way preference map and 3-way external preference map were previously reported in detail (Nunes et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The i × m portion was the same for each i × j portion of the individual matrices. PARAFAC procedures and the construction of a 3-way preference map and 3-way external preference map were previously reported in detail (Nunes et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For easy viewing of the jelly formulation sensory acceptance and to correlate with the physicochemical and rheological parameters, a 3-way external preference map obtained by PARAFAC (Nunes et al, 2011) was also elaborated. A 3-way array was arranged from matrices of i rows (i samples) and j + m columns (j consumers + m physicochemical measurements).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PARAFAC model was optimized using the value of Core Consistency Diagnostics (CDRCDNDIA) to choose the number of factors (Bro, 1997;Nunes et al, 2011). PARAFAC procedures and the construction of a 3-way preference map and 3-way external preference map were previously reported in detail (Nunes et al, 2011(Nunes et al, , 2012a. For a first view of the nutritional characteristics correlation with the different juice formulations, the physicochemical and texture data were analyzed by principal component analysis (PCA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The i × m portion was the same for each i × j portion of the individual matrices (Nunes et al, 2012a). The PARAFAC model was optimized using the value of Core Consistency Diagnostics (CDRCDNDIA) to choose the number of factors (Bro, 1997;Nunes et al, 2011). PARAFAC procedures and the construction of a 3-way preference map and 3-way external preference map were previously reported in detail (Nunes et al, 2011(Nunes et al, , 2012a.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to choose the best bars, sensory data were statistically analyzed by three-way Internal Preference Mapping (Nunes et al, 2011), which allows the evaluation of sample acceptability according to the panelist's hedonic scores, simultaneously considering the information on the acceptance of several attributes. The three-way preference mapping was obtained by the parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) (Bro, 1997) from a three-dimensional data set consisting of 5 bars ×100 panelists × 5 attributes.…”
Section: Analyses Of Cereal Barsmentioning
confidence: 99%