2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating coverage bias in next-generation sequencing of Escherichia coli

Abstract: Whole-genome sequencing is essential to many facets of infectious disease research. However, technical limitations such as bias in coverage and tagmentation, and difficulties characterising genomic regions with extreme GC content have created significant obstacles in its use. Illumina has claimed that the recently released DNA Prep library preparation kit, formerly known as Nextera Flex, overcomes some of these limitations. This study aimed to assess bias in coverage, tagmentation, GC content, average fragment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…characterized by low GC-content ( Uelze et al, 2020b ). Furthermore, in a recent study by Gunasekera et al, Nextera XT coverage bias was found in E. coli ( Gunasekera et al, 2021 ), although the authors argued that the benefit of using Nextera Flex/DNA Prep instead of Nextera XT was modest when sequencing the GC-neutral species E. coli .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…characterized by low GC-content ( Uelze et al, 2020b ). Furthermore, in a recent study by Gunasekera et al, Nextera XT coverage bias was found in E. coli ( Gunasekera et al, 2021 ), although the authors argued that the benefit of using Nextera Flex/DNA Prep instead of Nextera XT was modest when sequencing the GC-neutral species E. coli .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mapping fortuitously revealed lower coverage (~14,000 to 32,000 reads) between nucleotide positions 178 and 507 versus the flanking regions (~73,000 reads) probably due to library preparation bias. Coverage bias or unevenness has been attributed to low-GC target regions, library preparation enzymes, library PCR amplification, cluster amplification, and sequencing [ 23 , 24 , 25 ]. Zooming in allowed visualization of the sequences down to the nucleotide level for comparison to the reference genome and detection of variants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the enrichment for bacteria in our study prior to DNA extraction and metagenomic sequencing, most filamentous bacteria (if present) were probably lost and hence their BGCs not included in our dataset. In addition, some NRPS BGCs may be difficult to recover by next-generation sequencing approaches (e.g., from low-GC or high-AT species) due to biases of sequencing or assembly methods [ 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%