Evaluating critical institutional factors of Industry 4.0 for education reform

AlMalki, Hameeda A.; Durugbo, Christopher

doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122327

Cited by 29 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 77 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Such organising indicates major shifts in organisational operations, which necessitate structural, management, and cultural changes (Sligo et al 2019 ). Institutional transformation responds to institutional pressures for IA (AlMalki and Durugbo 2022 ; 2023 ), as well as fosters process mechanisms for IA, in line with the resource and institution theories presented by Table 3 .…”

Section: Future Research Challenges For Innovation Ambidexterity Scho...mentioning

confidence: 55%

What makes innovation ambidexterity manageable: a systematic review, multi-level model and future challenges

2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Innovation ambidexterity has emerged as a primary interest in management research due to the strategy’s support for adaptability and flexibility pursuant to competitiveness. While management studies investigate and explicate the socioeconomic and technological challenges of ambidexterity, there is a gap in knowledge on the determinants that underpin the management of ambidextrous organisations. To tackle this paucity, this article uses a systematic approach to review existing literature on innovation ambidexterity, identifying the main determinants for managing ambidexterity in organisations, and setting an agenda for future management research informed by these determinants. The review assembles and critically appraises 121 articles published between 2007 and 2021. It examines the research clusters, investigated industry sectors, research methodologies, management theories, and research contributions of studies on innovation ambidexterity. The review finds seven main determinants for managing ambidexterity consisting of: (i) process mechanisms, (ii) organisational learning, (iii) leadership styles, (iv) technology investments, (v) organisational contexts, (vi) environmental uncertainties, and (vii) institutional pressures. Using insights from the review process, the article proposes a set of management priorities and suggests seven areas for future ambidexterity research with respect to digital interdependence, organisational legacy, stewardship behaviour, technology sourcing, organisational resilience, environmental readiness, and institutional transformation. Theoretically, the article contributes to knowledge via a multi-level ‘wheel’ model of ambidexterity management that links management determinants to priorities, and managerially, the review offers a fresh perspective on management factors for ambidexterity.

show abstract

Section: Future Research Challenges For Innovation Ambidexterity Scho...mentioning

confidence: 55%

What makes innovation ambidexterity manageable: a systematic review, multi-level model and future challenges

2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In light of Industry, 4.0, AlMalki & Durugbo [ 30 ] stress the need to rethink education and expand human capability. Using a Delphi technique, this research identifies key institutional facilitators and impediments of Industry 4.0 for education, yielding national education reform suggestions.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

FinTech revolution in mineral management: Exploring the nexus between technology adoption and sustainable Resource utilization in an industry 4.0 context

Xu,

Nassani,

Qazi Abro

et al. 2024

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…As aspects of concreteness, virtual, remote, or hybrid education, educational innovation processes with ICT, digital transformation, and technological innovation find dynamizing aspects in the pedagogical models of STEAM from the recognition of interdisciplinary skills and the commitment of educational actors [82][83][84][85], education 4.0 [86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93], Big Data [94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101], Data Mining [102,103], Data Science [104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111], and Artificial Intelligence [112][113][114][115][116][117]. However, one should constantly reflect on the ethics, potentialities, and challenges of artificial intelligence in the framework of quality education [118].…”

Section: Educational Innovation and Ictmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trends in Educational Research for Sustainable Development in Postgraduate Education Programs at a University in Peru

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Sustainable Development Goals are part of the formative management in multiple universities that are committed to a better and more sustainable future for all; contributing to this from the postgraduate management in education involves rethinking educational research from lines that ensure that the research work has a real impact on the 2030 agenda. In this regard, the objective of this study was to identify and characterize specific lines of educational research for sustainable development in a private university in Lima, specifically in Postgraduate Education (Doctorate, Master’s and Second Specialty). The methodology deployed a qualitative approach, synchronizing the methods of systematization of experiences and grounded theory. A total of 186 students and 16 teachers participated, and the collection of information used three techniques: (1)—documentary review (5398 titles and other normative documents), (2)—asynchronous focus group (16 experienced teachers), and (3)—interview (202 participants). The results show four specific lines of research: (1)—Quality educational management, (2)—Teaching–learning–assessment, (3)—Educational innovation and ICT, and (4)—Training, research, and psychosocial factors in education. It concludes with a characterization of these lines based on an epistemic foundation that integrates current trends in educational research for sustainable development.

show abstract

Evaluating critical institutional factors of Industry 4.0 for education reform

Cited by 29 publications

References 77 publications

What makes innovation ambidexterity manageable: a systematic review, multi-level model and future challenges

What makes innovation ambidexterity manageable: a systematic review, multi-level model and future challenges

FinTech revolution in mineral management: Exploring the nexus between technology adoption and sustainable Resource utilization in an industry 4.0 context

Trends in Educational Research for Sustainable Development in Postgraduate Education Programs at a University in Peru

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About