2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-012-0577-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating DEM source and resolution uncertainties in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
50
1
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
50
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Several researchers have concluded that the DEM grid size influences the slope gradient and slope length factors (Gao 1997;Lin et al 2013;Mukherjee et al 2013). The average of slope gradient decreased with increasing DEM grid size (Gao 1997;David and McCabe 2000;Thompson et al 2001;Wang and Wang 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Several researchers have concluded that the DEM grid size influences the slope gradient and slope length factors (Gao 1997;Lin et al 2013;Mukherjee et al 2013). The average of slope gradient decreased with increasing DEM grid size (Gao 1997;David and McCabe 2000;Thompson et al 2001;Wang and Wang 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…During the last decade, the first CTI product at 1 km resolution from HYDRO1k global data set released by US Geological Survey (USGS) in 2000 has become the most commonly applied global data set for large-scale applications (Kleinen et al, 2012;Lei et al, 2014;Ringeval et al, 2012;. However, HYDRO1k has been proven to potentially overestimate inundation extent due to a lack in quality of the underlying digital elevation model (DEM) (Grabs et al, 2009;Lin et al, 2010Lin et al, , 2013Sørensen and Seibert, 2007). With recent advances in the development of DEMs (Danielson and Gesch, 2011;Lehner et al, 2008), there is both a requirement and an opportunity to investigate uncertainties caused by CTI parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of DEMs have been shown to vary from one source to another, which could have an impact on model parameters thereby compromising the quality of model results (Wu et al 2008;Lin et al 2013). However, Lin et al (2013) investigated the impact of DEM spatial resolution on SWAT model results and reported that, the latter had a significant impact on water quality and sediment load simulation but simulated streamflow was not sensitive to DEM spatial resolution. Given that the purpose of this study was streamflow simulation, a DEM with spatial resolution of 90 m was used.…”
Section: Spatial Datamentioning
confidence: 99%