2018
DOI: 10.3390/rs10040513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Different Methods for Estimating Diameter at Breast Height from Terrestrial Laser Scanning

Abstract: Abstract:The accurate measurement of diameter at breast height (DBH) is essential to forest operational management, forest inventory, and carbon cycle modeling. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) is a measurement technique that allows rapid, automatic, and periodical estimates of DBH information. With the multitude of DBH estimation approaches available, a systematic study is needed to compare different algorithms and evaluate the ideal situations to use a specific algorithm. To contribute to such an approach, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The identified stem point clouds were then clipped into vertical slices. Considering the possible bias of the horizontal stem center and the tree density of the plots, the side length of the vertical clipping square was set at 2 m. Based on prior research [19], the vertical point cloud slice thickness was set to be 20 cm to guarantee circle fitting accuracy. The point cloud for each stem was clipped with only 2 m × 2 m × 0.2 m cubic space remaining.…”
Section: Point Cloud Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The identified stem point clouds were then clipped into vertical slices. Considering the possible bias of the horizontal stem center and the tree density of the plots, the side length of the vertical clipping square was set at 2 m. Based on prior research [19], the vertical point cloud slice thickness was set to be 20 cm to guarantee circle fitting accuracy. The point cloud for each stem was clipped with only 2 m × 2 m × 0.2 m cubic space remaining.…”
Section: Point Cloud Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The circle fitting algorithm used in ANPDA is the Landau algorithm [42], which was implemented by Sumith [43] and proved to be reliable for DBH estimation based on TLS point cloud data by Chang et al [19]. The Landau algorithm is a non-iterative linear least square algorithm.…”
Section: Circle Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After stem extraction, the DBH can be estimated from the stem points at breast height. There have been many DBH methods proposed, such as linear least square (Landau algorithm) circle fitting [3,10], nonlinear least squares (Gauss Newton) circle fitting [7], crescent moon method proposed by Kiraly and Brolly [47], RANSAC circle detection [39], Hough transform, and random Hough transform [26,31,40]. However, most of them are based on the assumption that the stem section is circular.…”
Section: Robust Least Squares Elliptic Fitting For Dbh Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main task is to estimate the optimal DBH parameters from the point cloud of the trunk at the corresponding height. Many articles have proposed many DBH estimation methods, such as linearized or nonlinear least square circle fitting [3,7,24], Hough-transform [26], cylinder fitting [15,38], random sample consensus (RANSAC) algorithm [8,39], and random Hough transform [31,40]. Most of these methods model the stem profiles as a circle and fit the diameter parameter from the stem points at the breast height.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid development of laser scanner, remote sensing is widely used in 3D reconstruction and recognition in different fields due to the advantages of non-contact, high precision and high efficiency [4]. In the past few decades, 3D reconstruction from point clouds has gained great attention, especially for parameter measurement for different types of trees [5][6][7]. Yun et al [8] proposed a leaf area measurement method based on 3D point cloud reconstruction using ground-based light detection and ranging (LiDAR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%