2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2007.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating digital video recorder systems using analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The ANP method of could improve the AHP weakness took the form of the capacity accommodates the connection between the criterion or the alternative [3,4]. The connection in the ANP method of having 2 kinds that is the connection in one set of the element (inner dependence) and the connection between the different element (outer dependence).…”
Section: Analytical Network Process Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ANP method of could improve the AHP weakness took the form of the capacity accommodates the connection between the criterion or the alternative [3,4]. The connection in the ANP method of having 2 kinds that is the connection in one set of the element (inner dependence) and the connection between the different element (outer dependence).…”
Section: Analytical Network Process Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, n = 15 and λ max = 15.58; therefore CI = 0.04. The consistency ratio (CR = [(CI/RI)]) was determined depending on [12], through dividing the consistency index value (CI) by the Random index value (RI = 15.9) because the number of criteria was 15 [24] [25]. If the value of Consistency Ratio is smaller than 0.1, the ratio point to a reasonable consistency level in the pairwise comparison.…”
Section: Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RI in the above equation represents the average consistency index for numerous random entries of same-order reciprocal matrices. If CR ≤ 0.1, then the estimate is accepted; otherwise, a new comparison matrix is solicited until CR ≤ 0.1 (Chang et al, 2007).…”
Section: (Iv) Check the Consistency Of Pair-wise Judgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%