Evaluating dose delivered of a behavioral intervention for childhood obesity prevention: a secondary analysis

Abstract

Background: Current recommendations for intensive behavioral interventions for childhood obesity treatment do not account for variable participant attendance, optimal duration of the intervention, mode of delivery (phone vs. face-to-face), or address obesity prevention among young children. A secondary analysis of an active one-year behavioral intervention for childhood obesity prevention was conducted to test how "dose delivered" was associated with body mass index z-score (BMI-Z) across 3 years of follow-up. Methods: Parent-child pairs were eligible if they qualified for government assistance and spoke English or Spanish. Children were between three and 5 years old and were at risk for but not yet obese (BMI percentiles ≥50th and < 95th). The intended intervention dose was 18 h over 3-months via 12 face-to-face "intensive sessions" (90 min each) and 6.75 h over the next 9 months via 9 "maintenance phone calls" (45 min each). Ordinary least-squares multivariable regression was utilized to test for associations between dose delivered and child BMI-Z immediately after the 1-year intervention, and at 2-, and 3-year follow-up, including participants who were initially randomized to the control group as having "zero" dose. Results: Among 610 parent-child pairs (intervention n = 304, control n = 306), mean child age was 4.3 (SD = 0.9) years and 51.8% were female. Mean dose delivered was 10.9 (SD = 2.5) of 12 intensive sessions and 7.7 (SD = 2.4) of 9 maintenance calls. Multivariable linear regression models indicated statistically significant associations of intensive face-to-face contacts (B =-0.011; 95% CI [− 0.021, − 0.001]; p = 0.029) and maintenance calls (B =-0.015; 95% CI [− 0.026, − 0.004]; p = 0.006) with lower BMI-Z immediately following the 1-year intervention. Their interaction was also significant (p = 0.04), such that parentchild pairs who received higher numbers of both face-to-face intensive sessions (> 6) and maintenance calls (> 8) were predicted to have lower BMI-Z. Sustained impacts were not statistically significant at 2-or 3-year follow-up. Conclusions: In a behavioral intervention for childhood obesity prevention, the combination of a modest dose of face-toface sessions (> 6 h over 3 months) with sustained maintenance calls (> 8 calls over 9 months) was associated with improved BMI-Z at 1-year for underserved preschool aged children, but sustained impacts were not statistically significant at 2 or 3 year follow-up. Clinical trial registration: The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01316653) on March 16, 2011, which was prior to participant enrollment.

Sustained effects of the INFORM cluster randomized trial: an observational post-intervention study

“…An alternative explanation is that the minimum “dose” of feedback required to facilitate sustainability was achieved with the less intense study arm. This finding contrasts with clinical studies reporting that higher intervention intensity supports better intervention success and sustainability [ 54 – 56 ]. Shelton et al [ 32 ] highlight the important research gap related to whether sustainability depends on the type and intensity of the intervention.…”

Feasibility and Efficacy of the “FUNPALs Playgroup” Intervention to Improve Toddler Dietary and Activity Behaviors: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

“…Parental BMI has been found associated with children's health behavior development [59]. Further, age of children and received intervention dose can influence success of family-based childhood obesity prevention programs [60,61]. Therefore, nearest neighbors were determined by computing the distance between the recipient (missing case) and all other subjects (candidate donors) based on the three variables mentioned above.…”

Wearable Devices Decrease Attrition among Families Participating in an Obesity Intervention at a Federally Qualified Health Center

“…31 At least one study has found that as little as five to six contact hours and attending approximately 60% of sessions had a positive impact on obesity outcomes. 32 This is comporable to our threshold of approximately 60% attendance and eight contact hours.…”