Environmental films
are atmospheric materials that passively deposit
and form coatings on most outdoor surfaces. Film heterogeneity in
the chemical makeup and physical form often makes understanding their
contributions to the environment difficult. It is well known that
cities or rural areas produce unique films. To study how this trend
changes with a known distance, we characterize two films, collected
at the same time, separated by ∼1 km: representing city (CB)
and suburban (CP) areas. The chemical analysis shows that the urban
(CB) film, in comparison to its suburban (CP) counterpart, has higher
surface coverage (+4.8%) and higher elemental diversity in metals.
The physical form and roughness show that the urban (CB) sample collects
more particulate than the suburban (CP) sample. This accumulation
increases the surface area suggesting that the urban (CB) sample forms
faster and maintains higher adsorption capacity than the suburban
sample. The urban (CB) sample has metals often associated with fireworks
meaning that surfaces could act as a sink and source for metallic
species impacting local ecosystems through rainwater wash-off. The
urban samples discharge more of the accumulated material (inorganic
and organic water-soluble species) when extracted with water (+2 μg/cm2). This means that urban sites, like buildings, contribute
more to waste water pollution than the suburban sites, like houses.
There is also potential for this contribution to be more harmful in
urban areas. These findings have important applications in understanding
air and water quality in urban and suburban areas.