2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-021-05007-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating essential processes and forecast requirements for meteotsunami-induced coastal flooding

Abstract: Meteotsunamis pose a unique threat to coastal communities and often lead to damage of coastal infrastructure, deluge of nearby property, and loss of life and injury. The Great Lakes are a known hot-spot of meteotsunami activity and serve as an important region for investigation of essential hydrodynamic processes and model forecast requirements in meteotsunami-induced coastal flooding. For this work, we developed an advanced hydrodynamic model and evaluate key model attributes and dynamic processes, including:… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This provides challenges for analysis of travel times, directionality, reflection/refraction, and estimates of tsunami runup as we are comparing datasets with different distances from meteotsunami origin, coastline shapes, and bathymetries, as well as limitations in the accuracy of numerical weather forcing, hydrodynamic model physics, and topographic and bathymetric representation. A recent meteotsunami study has illustrated the sensitivity of meteotsunami simulations to shoreline resolution, which can impact wave amplitude and period (Huang et al., 2021). Additionally, we note there is insufficient information about how wetland systems beyond our studied location may respond to differing event magnitude, coastline shape, nearshore bathymetry, and lake levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This provides challenges for analysis of travel times, directionality, reflection/refraction, and estimates of tsunami runup as we are comparing datasets with different distances from meteotsunami origin, coastline shapes, and bathymetries, as well as limitations in the accuracy of numerical weather forcing, hydrodynamic model physics, and topographic and bathymetric representation. A recent meteotsunami study has illustrated the sensitivity of meteotsunami simulations to shoreline resolution, which can impact wave amplitude and period (Huang et al., 2021). Additionally, we note there is insufficient information about how wetland systems beyond our studied location may respond to differing event magnitude, coastline shape, nearshore bathymetry, and lake levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To supplement the analysis of observed water level and atmospheric data during the 20 July 2019, event, we used a hydrodynamic model to simulate the water surface response and help in identification of meteotsunami generation. The model is based on the Finite Volume Community Ocean Model (FVCOM; Chen et al., 2006), which has been adapted for freshwater and successfully implemented for Great Lakes meteotsunami simulation (Anderson et al., 2015; Anderson & Mann, 2021; Huang et al., 2021) and other physical processes (Anderson et al., 2018; Anderson & Schwab, 2013, 2017). The model uses an unstructured grid with horizontal resolution that ranges from 100 m in the nearshore to 2,500 m in offshore regions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The version of RegCM used in this study is a 3-D, hydrostatic, compressible, primitive equation, σ -coordinate version (RegCM4.3.4) synchronously coupled with the Community Land Model version 4.5 (CLM4.5, Oleson et al, 2010Oleson et al, , 2013, which has the option to include prognostic treatment of the carbon and nitrogen cycles and dynamic vegetation (RegCM-CLM-CNDV, Wang et al, 2016). The FV-COM is an unstructured grid, finite-volume, 3-D, primitive equation, hydrodynamic model with a generalized terrainfollowing coordinate system in the vertical and triangular meshes in the horizontal, and is widely applied to coastal oceans and the Great Lakes (Xue et al, 2014(Xue et al, , 2015Anderson et al, 2018;Huang et al, 2019Huang et al, , 2021aYe et al, 2019Ye et al, , 2020Ibrahim et al, 2020). The version of FVCOM used in this study is derived from FVCOM 4.3.1 without applying nudging or other similar nonphysical constraints.…”
Section: Glarm-v2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bottom friction, and depth-induced wave breaking, as well as energy redistribution through nonlinear wave-wave interactions. Recognized as a reliable coastal community wave model, SWAN has been widely applied for wave hindcasting and forecasting (Rogers et al, 2003(Rogers et al, , 2007 for the Great Lakes (Anderson et al, 2015;Mao et al, 2016;Huang et al, 2021) and coastal oceans (Dietrich et al, 2011;Huang et al, 2013;Cheng et al, 2015;Xie et al, 2016;Niroomandi et al, 2018;Xie et al, 2019).…”
Section: Model Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%