2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10458-015-9320-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating fault tolerance approaches in multi-agent systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal of the experimental evaluation is to show how the self-corrective model performs in DIAS under a lightweight 6 Available at https://github.com/epournaras/PeerSamplingService (last accessed: January 2017 7 Available at http://brutuswiki.ethz.ch (last accessed: January 2017). 8 Available at http://www.ucd.ie/issda/data/ commissionforenergyregulationcer/ (last accessed: February 2017) 9 Available at https://weka.wikispaces.com (last accessed: February 2017) and heavyweight scenario of network adjustments focusing 10 on leaves and rejoins of nodes. In both scenarios, the specific nodes leaving the network are fixed between the different experiments to compare the results.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The goal of the experimental evaluation is to show how the self-corrective model performs in DIAS under a lightweight 6 Available at https://github.com/epournaras/PeerSamplingService (last accessed: January 2017 7 Available at http://brutuswiki.ethz.ch (last accessed: January 2017). 8 Available at http://www.ucd.ie/issda/data/ commissionforenergyregulationcer/ (last accessed: February 2017) 9 Available at https://weka.wikispaces.com (last accessed: February 2017) and heavyweight scenario of network adjustments focusing 10 on leaves and rejoins of nodes. In both scenarios, the specific nodes leaving the network are fixed between the different experiments to compare the results.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A majority of fault-detection, replication and fault-tolerance mechanisms for multi-agent systems are managed in a centralized fashion by dedicated, for this purpose, replication servers, proxies and storage of checkpoints [18], [19], [8]. In contrast, the agents of the proposed self-corrective model rely on the peer sampling service for a fully decentralized detection and orchestration of reverse computations.…”
Section: Comparison With Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These systems need to run smoothly without any failure even in the presence of faulty behavior of different agents (Briot et al, 2007). In a large scale MAS, failures ratio grows with the number of agents, hosts and duration required for agents' task execution (Stanković et al, 2017). It is very difficult to recognize faulty agents in advance to avoid their crashes (Ductor et al, 2011), so there is strong need for fault tolerance schemes in such systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%