2022
DOI: 10.1080/03067319.2022.2145196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating feasibility of biosorption technique for heavy metals removal: limitations and future perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 198 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bacterial strains displayed strong capabilities in removing heavy metals at lower concentrations, yet their effectiveness was limited when dealing with higher concentrations of heavy metals. This pattern was aligned with the findings of Kumar and Oommen [ 49 ], who observed a decline in removal percentages as the initial concentrations of Cd, Cr, Hg, and Pb increased, attributed to saturation of sorption sites on adsorbents.
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The bacterial strains displayed strong capabilities in removing heavy metals at lower concentrations, yet their effectiveness was limited when dealing with higher concentrations of heavy metals. This pattern was aligned with the findings of Kumar and Oommen [ 49 ], who observed a decline in removal percentages as the initial concentrations of Cd, Cr, Hg, and Pb increased, attributed to saturation of sorption sites on adsorbents.
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, as the metal concentration increases, the number of functional groups to which the metal is attached is similar. According to a previous study, there is a certain saturation capacity in removing metals from the environment and metal bioremoval capacity becomes saturated after a certain concentration of the pollutant [25]. In our study, as the metal concentration is increased, the number of functional groups to which the metal will be attached was similar in all tested media.…”
Section: Copper(ii) Bioremoval At Different Pollutant Concentrationssupporting
confidence: 70%