2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2006.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating financial time series models for irregularly spaced data: A spectral density approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the result of this paper, this approach is questionable since the Box-Pierce statistic may not follow the usual χ 2 distribution asymptotically under the null hypothesis. A similar criticism has been pointed out in the univariate case, see Li and Yu (2003) and the discussion in Duchesne and Pacurar (2008). In fact, in a related context, it has been shown that the Box-Pierce-Ljung type test is invalid for GARCH models (Li and Mak, 1994) and multivariate GARCH models (Ling and Li, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the result of this paper, this approach is questionable since the Box-Pierce statistic may not follow the usual χ 2 distribution asymptotically under the null hypothesis. A similar criticism has been pointed out in the univariate case, see Li and Yu (2003) and the discussion in Duchesne and Pacurar (2008). In fact, in a related context, it has been shown that the Box-Pierce-Ljung type test is invalid for GARCH models (Li and Mak, 1994) and multivariate GARCH models (Ling and Li, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Meitz and Teräsvirta (2006) devised a class of Lagrange multiplier (LM) tests against various forms of misspecification of the conditional expectations and showed that the LM test of no ACD effect on residuals is asymptotically equivalent to that proposed by Li and Yu (2003). Duchesne and Pacurar (2008) made use of a kernel spectral density estimator of the residuals to construct some adequacy tests for ACD models. Chen and Hsieh (2010) proposed a set of generalized moment tests for the conditional expectations based on the quasi-maximum exponential likelihood method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For instance, Li & Yu (2003) investigated the asymptotic distribution of the autocorrelations of the standardized durations, the residuals of the ACD model, which resulted in a chi-squared test that is more accurate than the ordinary portmanteau tests. On the other hand, Duchesne & Pacurar (2008) have dealt with the same problem using a spectral density approach. Hong & Li (2007) made use of the generalized spectrum concept to develop the generalized spectral derivative test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hautsch (2006) also considers some LM tests as well as various conditional moment tests and generalized conditional moment tests for conditional expected duration specification. Building on Hong (1996, 1997), Duchesne and Pacurar (2006) construct tests for the adequacy of ACD models, based on a kernel spectral density estimator of the standardized innovation process. They obtain a generalized version of the classical Box-Pierce-Ljung test statistic as a special case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%