Evaluating food hubs: Reporting on a participatory action project

Abstract

Food hubs create a range of economic, social, and environmental impacts through a wide variety of activities and programs. Evaluation of these impacts is important; however, many hubs lack the capacity (including time, resources, knowledge, and expertise) to do effective, ongoing evaluation work. This lack of capacity is exacerbated by the difficul¬ties inherent in capturing the kinds of complex, multidimensional, context-specific impacts and outcomes that many of these businesses and organizations strive to achieve. This paper reports on a participatory research project designed to develop a resource to support food hub evaluation efforts. It presents highlights from the guide that was created and discusses associated insights regarding the tensions and opportunities of food hub evaluation. We argue that food hubs need to be engaging in evaluation efforts, even in the face of significant resource constraints, as a means of strengthening individual entities and the sector as a whole. These efforts must be carefully aligned with a hub’s stage of development and context-specific, multifunctional goals. They should also account for food hubs’ emergent, dynamic, and adaptive nature. To that end, participatory evaluation methodologies that take a flexible, collaborative, action-oriented approach are especially relevant.

Reflecting on deepening participation in recruitment and evaluation in citizen science - Lessons from the WeCount project.

“…Reflecting on participatory evaluation more generally, the use of participatory evaluation methodologies in citizen science has the potential to greatly contribute to impact assessment, as well as empower participants and build capacity. However, it is important to acknowledge that some projects may lack the capacity and resources to employ such methodologies (Nelson and Landman, 2020). Crishna (2007) argues that participatory evaluation is time consuming and requires skill-building for participants.…”

Harvesting a participatory movement': Initial participatory action research with the Jewish Farmer Network

“…We see our PAR work as cyclical and our relations as long-standing, so we take several lessons into the next iteration of research. JFN's need for evaluative surveys became clear (Nelson & Landman, 2020) after the initial research design and during the collaborative designing of our participatory workshop. The surveys addressed demographics of attendees and conference goals, but lacked direct questions about identity, attitudes, and future direc-tions.…”