2016 12th International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ie.2016.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Future Automation Work in Process Plants with an Experience-Driven Science Fiction Prototype

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This line of work has been introduced earlier, e.g. in [26,27], and the validation of SFPs has been demonstrated in [3,8]. As compared to this earlier research, this article nevertheless emphasized the user research results, thus allowing the process control workers' opinions to be justifiably heard.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This line of work has been introduced earlier, e.g. in [26,27], and the validation of SFPs has been demonstrated in [3,8]. As compared to this earlier research, this article nevertheless emphasized the user research results, thus allowing the process control workers' opinions to be justifiably heard.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The decision-makers can use this result as a broad understanding to avoid the negative consequences of using such future technologies (Jenkins et al, 2020). In the design process, it is popular to use simple story studies (Jenkins et al, 2020;Kymalainen et al, 2016) based on trends and events to capture future possibilities. This can generate ideas by facilitating brainstorming sessions for more realistic scenarios or adopting 'blue sky thinking' to turn current trends and signals into the future experience (Jenkins et al, 2020).…”
Section: Future Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, using these approaches through these design tools to design new technologies is challenging and needs a facilitated environment to support the participant to ensure success. Using tangible design tools can establish a shared 'language' through physical form when verbal communication fails due to professional terminology and misalignments between different professional working cultures (Jenkins et al, 2020;Kymalainen et al, 2016;Rygh and Clatworthy, 2019). On the one hand, it is vital to match the design tools and the people interacting with them in the co-designing sessions.…”
Section: Co-designing and Selecting The Right Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a significant value in working to further develop and refine design guidelines for human-AI interaction [2,7]. There is a need for cooperation and better communication in human teams and individuals and AI systems to achieve better UX goals in automation scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%