2023
DOI: 10.5382/econgeo.4979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Geochemical Discriminants in Archean Gold Deposits: A Superior Province Perspective with an Emphasis on the Abitibi Greenstone Belt

Abstract: Discriminating Archean Au deposit types and related ore-forming processes is challenging but paramount for increasing Au exploration success. This study tests the validity of applying geochemical data generated from conventional bulk versus modern in situ methods as discriminants for classifying Au deposits in the Archean Swayze greenstone belt with further comparison to other deposits in the contiguous Abitibi greenstone belt and Red Lake area (Superior Province, Canada). The study used five well-characterize… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 95 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The association of Au with Bi and Te is also relevant to whether the progenitor Au-bearing hydrothermal fluids that form some orogenic deposits are of metamorphic and/or magmatic origin [8][9][10][11][12]. Given the apparent similarity in the isotopic and chemical nature of the fluids derived from these two reservoirs [3,8,[13][14][15], the usefulness of the geochemical association of Au with various elements as evidence for a specific fluid source has been a subject of interest (see [16] and references therein), and mineral assemblages and compositions that reflect a Au-Bi-Te association are often taken, in part, to be diagnostic of a magmatic-hydrothermal origin for ore metals [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Indeed, both the transport of Au in Bi-rich polymetallic melts and its association with Bi and Te have been repeatedly documented in a variety of magmatic-hydrothermal environments, including skarns [24][25][26][27][28], iron oxide copper-gold (IOCG) and iron oxide cobalt-gold-bismuth deposits [29,30], intrusion-related gold systems [31], greisens [32], and porphyry-epithermal systems [28,33,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association of Au with Bi and Te is also relevant to whether the progenitor Au-bearing hydrothermal fluids that form some orogenic deposits are of metamorphic and/or magmatic origin [8][9][10][11][12]. Given the apparent similarity in the isotopic and chemical nature of the fluids derived from these two reservoirs [3,8,[13][14][15], the usefulness of the geochemical association of Au with various elements as evidence for a specific fluid source has been a subject of interest (see [16] and references therein), and mineral assemblages and compositions that reflect a Au-Bi-Te association are often taken, in part, to be diagnostic of a magmatic-hydrothermal origin for ore metals [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Indeed, both the transport of Au in Bi-rich polymetallic melts and its association with Bi and Te have been repeatedly documented in a variety of magmatic-hydrothermal environments, including skarns [24][25][26][27][28], iron oxide copper-gold (IOCG) and iron oxide cobalt-gold-bismuth deposits [29,30], intrusion-related gold systems [31], greisens [32], and porphyry-epithermal systems [28,33,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%