2013
DOI: 10.1080/09296174.2013.799912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating goodness-of-fit of discrete distribution models in quantitative linguistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained values of R 2 appear to be quite close to unity meaning the fit is good (usually, R 2 > 0.9 is considered acceptable [22]). For instance, the Chinese and Lojban translations of Alice in Wonderland yield R 2 > 0.98 and R 2 > 0.99, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The obtained values of R 2 appear to be quite close to unity meaning the fit is good (usually, R 2 > 0.9 is considered acceptable [22]). For instance, the Chinese and Lojban translations of Alice in Wonderland yield R 2 > 0.98 and R 2 > 0.99, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The goodness-of-fit can be tested using the determination coefficient R 2 defined by [22]: In this expression, N exp is the mean value of observed N exp j . In our case, the summations run over all the js starting from 2 as j = 1 is fixed by z.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a rule of thumb, ≤ 0.02 indicates a good fit; a "more tolerant" version of the rule accepts a good fit of a model if ≤ 0.05 (cf. Mačutek and Wimmer, 2013, where also other possibilities how to avoid the problem of large samples are mentioned). Parameters were estimated by the minimum 2 method (cf.…”
Section: Language Materials and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…problem is the chi-square goodness-of-fit test, whose reliability is increasingly doubted by linguists (Wang, 2012;Mačutek & Wimmer, 2013). It is inadequate if the sample size is very large, but no criterion with respect to what "large" means is given so far.…”
Section: Rank-frequency Distribution Of Parts Of Speechmentioning
confidence: 99%