Evaluating Group Member Behaviour Under Individualist and Collectivist Norms

Abstract

Research has shown that people in group contexts prefer group members who display collectivist as opposed to individualist behaviour, but that preference is attenuated when the prevailing group norm prescribes individualism. The present study investigated this effect in people from a predominantly individualist or collectivist cultural background. Due to their greater sensitivity to contextual social cues, individuals from a collectivist background were expected to give more polarised evaluations of group members than individuals from an individualist background. Group member evaluations were gathered in samples from a collectivist and an individualist background, manipulating the prevailing group norm (individualist or collectivist) and the behaviour of a hypothetical group member (individualist or collectivist). The previously observed attenuation effect in which people provided more positive evaluations of individualist behaviour under an individualist, as opposed to a collectivist, group norm was found only in participants from a collectivist cultural background. Implications of our findings and the absence of an attenuation effect in the individualist sample are discussed.

Who is distressed? A comparison of psychosocial stress in pregnancy across seven ethnicities

“…Curiously, the vast majority (>90 %) of women from the White reference group (used as a proxy for Western/individualistic orientation) reported adequate levels of social support. Although collectivist and individualist cultures differ in the extent to which cooperation, competition, or individualism are emphasized [ 47 ], inadequate social support may not be a function of the culture of origin [ 48 ]. In other words, it should not be assumed that women who identify with individualistic cultures experience lower levels of social support, nor that women from collectivist cultures experience greater levels of social support.…”

An experimental investigation of the interpersonal ramifications of lateness to workplace meetings

“…Participants were instructed to think of the person who arrived late and indicate their agreement (1 = strongly disagree , 5 = strongly agree ) to a series of five statements. Sample items include ‘I would befriend the late arrival’ and ‘The late arrival's behaviour was acceptable’ (Hagger, Rentzelas, & Koch, ).…”

To Excuse or Not to Excuse: Effect of Explanation Type and Provision on Reactions to a Workplace Behavioral Transgression

“…We expect participants will have greater prosocial intentions toward those who provide an apology or excuse, compared to those with no explanation. The second, expected work performance is a work-focused attitudinal measure of other people's likely performance on the job in the future (Hagger, Rentzelas, & Koch, 2014). Theoretically speaking, Lepine and Van Dyne (2001) explored the potential responses to peers who are low performers suggesting that negative attributions toward these low performers influences the form of helping that may occur or not occur.…”

“…Performance Expectation Performance expectation was evaluated using a five-item measure developed by Hagger et al (2014). Participants considered the late arrival and rated how they thought that person would perform at work in a variety of areas when compared to other employees (1 = one of the worst, 5 = one of the best) across five dimensions.…”