2010
DOI: 10.1071/wr08093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating habitat quality of vertebrates using conservation physiology tools

Abstract: Studies examining how wildlife populations perceive and respond to habitat are common, and many attempt to understand how the quality of available habitats influences population processes such as survival and recruitment. Traditional methods to estimate habitat quality (e.g. population density) have not led to great advancement in our understanding of relationships between habitat and fitness in recent years. Metrics from the discipline of conservation physiology could help researchers to address these difficu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
80
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
2
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since stress in wildlife can be an indicator of poor habitat quality, increased energy expenditure, and decreased health status (e.g. Sapolsky, 1996;Marra & Holberton, 1998;Wingfield & Ramenofsky, 1999;Sapolsky, Romero & Munck, 2000;Homan, Reed & Romero, 2003;Pride, 2005c;Landys, Ramenofsky & Wingfield, 2006;Homyack, 2010), and because animal populations in some fragmented habitats exhibit chronically higher stress hormone levels compared with those residing in intact forest (Chapman et al, 2006;Mart ınez-Mota et al, 2007;Rangel-Negr ın et al, 2009;Irwin et al, 2010;Johnstone, Lill & Reina, 2012), measuring GC levels is an important conservation consideration with respect to a population's long-term viability in a disturbed habitat (Romero, 2004). L. catta populations are now almost exclusively restricted to isolated forest fragments Bodin et al, 2006;Goodman et al, 2006;Gould & Andrianomena, 2015;Gould & Sauther, 2016;LaFleur et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since stress in wildlife can be an indicator of poor habitat quality, increased energy expenditure, and decreased health status (e.g. Sapolsky, 1996;Marra & Holberton, 1998;Wingfield & Ramenofsky, 1999;Sapolsky, Romero & Munck, 2000;Homan, Reed & Romero, 2003;Pride, 2005c;Landys, Ramenofsky & Wingfield, 2006;Homyack, 2010), and because animal populations in some fragmented habitats exhibit chronically higher stress hormone levels compared with those residing in intact forest (Chapman et al, 2006;Mart ınez-Mota et al, 2007;Rangel-Negr ın et al, 2009;Irwin et al, 2010;Johnstone, Lill & Reina, 2012), measuring GC levels is an important conservation consideration with respect to a population's long-term viability in a disturbed habitat (Romero, 2004). L. catta populations are now almost exclusively restricted to isolated forest fragments Bodin et al, 2006;Goodman et al, 2006;Gould & Andrianomena, 2015;Gould & Sauther, 2016;LaFleur et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a reiterated call (e.g., Carey 2005, Stevenson 2006, Homyack 2010, Ellis et al 2012 to perform more integrated research in the field of conservation physiology. By simultaneously measuring glucocorticoid excretion, activity, and energy budgets, the present experiments contribute to bridging this gap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional challenge for urban birds may be that any new vegetation planted by people is usually unlikely to resemble pre-settlement habitat (Cook et al 2013;Thomson et al 2003). Because the measuring of habitat quality in a direct way is often not feasible, the evaluation of individual condition offers an alternative method to assess habitat quality (Homyack 2010;Ellis et al 2012). Body condition indices have been used to evaluate impacts of stressors and disturbances, assessing habitat fragmentation or to provide insights into the nutritional status of animals in different habitat types Bańbura et al 2013;Milenkaya et al 2013;Kaliński et al 2014;Minias 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%