2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating health systems’ preparedness for emerging infectious diseases: A novel conceptual and analytic framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current thinking in outbreak response planning in public health recommends that outbreak planning needs to be locally adapted depending on the presence or absence of public health infrastructure for each individual disease [8]. In this review, just one of the 14 plans provided an holistic and comprehensive picture of how the surveillance system and response plan should be organised in order to (a) detect a dengue outbreak at an early stage through clearly defined and validated alert signals, (b) exactly define that a dengue outbreak has started, and (c) organise an early response to the warning signals detected, or a late response when an outbreak has been verified [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current thinking in outbreak response planning in public health recommends that outbreak planning needs to be locally adapted depending on the presence or absence of public health infrastructure for each individual disease [8]. In this review, just one of the 14 plans provided an holistic and comprehensive picture of how the surveillance system and response plan should be organised in order to (a) detect a dengue outbreak at an early stage through clearly defined and validated alert signals, (b) exactly define that a dengue outbreak has started, and (c) organise an early response to the warning signals detected, or a late response when an outbreak has been verified [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirteen of the articles were qualitative studies and nine used a mixed-methods design. Most of the qualitative studies combined interviews with observations (Broz et al 2009;Forrester et al 2014aForrester et al , 2014bNielsen et al 2015;Pathmanathan et al 2014;Summers et al 2014), with occasional studies adding focus groups (Carrion Martin et al 2016;Dynes et al 2015;Lee-Kwan et al 2014), documentary analysis (Abramowitz et al 2015;Krumkamp et al 2010) or community mapping (Hagan et al 2015). In the case of the mixed-methods studies, these either combined interviews with structured surveys (Bile et al 2010;Brahmbhatt et al 2010;Flores et al 2011), or interviews and observations with secondary data analysis (Brennan and Rimba 2005;Güereña-Burgueño et al 2006;Kilmarx et al 2014;Matanock et al 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of usage of health facility/services and health needs Identification of causes of the outbreak (Cheung et al 2003) Assessment of capacity to respond to the outbreak (Krumkamp et al 2010) Assessment of control strategies (Broz et al 2009;Flores et al 2011) Analysis of the barriers behind lack of health facility use (Carrion Martin et al 2016;Dynes et al 2015;Yamanis et al 2016…”
Section: Evaluation Of Control Strategies and Other Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Care must be taken when comparing data from different countries,1 and various reasons may explain the observed differences 2. But from a public health perspective, experience with SARS3 suggests that Germany’s intensive system of testing, contact tracing, and quarantine were critical to successful control of the outbreak, especially given the role of super spreading events that seem to shape the current epidemic in Germany, with the most recent ones in meat plants 3…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%