Evaluating heart rate variability as a predictor of the influence of lying on memory

Paige, Laura E.; Wolf, Jutta M.; Gutchess, Angela H.

doi:10.1080/09658211.2020.1849307

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 67 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, cardiac vagal tone has been shown to positively correlate with better memory for emotionally charged stimuli ( 103 , 104 ), albeit no relation with memory for neutral stimuli. In contrast, several studies showed that HRV during wakefulness does not predict episodic memory performance ( 105 – 107 ). Taken together, the emerging picture of the role of CNS and ANS inputs for cognitive enhancement is that SWS is an optimal brain state for the stabilization of episodic, long-term, nonemotional memories, as well as for the improvement of executive function, but not necessarily via the same mechanisms.…”

Section: Cns and Ans Contributions To Long-term Memorymentioning

confidence: 90%

Understanding the roles of central and autonomic activity during sleep in the improvement of working memory and episodic memory

Chen

Zhang

Thayer

et al. 2022

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The last decade has seen significant progress in identifying sleep mechanisms that support cognition. Most of these studies focus on the link between electrophysiological events of the central nervous system during sleep and improvements in different cognitive domains, while the dynamic shifts of the autonomic nervous system across sleep have been largely overlooked. Recent studies, however, have identified significant contributions of autonomic inputs during sleep to cognition. Yet, there remain considerable gaps in understanding how central and autonomic systems work together during sleep to facilitate cognitive improvement. In this article we examine the evidence for the independent and interactive roles of central and autonomic activities during sleep and wake in cognitive processing. We specifically focus on the prefrontal–subcortical structures supporting working memory and mechanisms underlying the formation of hippocampal-dependent episodic memory. Our Slow Oscillation Switch Model identifies separate and competing underlying mechanisms supporting the two memory domains at the synaptic, systems, and behavioral levels. We propose that sleep is a competitive arena in which both memory domains vie for limited resources, experimentally demonstrated when boosting one system leads to a functional trade-off in electrophysiological and behavioral outcomes. As these findings inevitably lead to further questions, we suggest areas of future research to better understand how the brain and body interact to support a wide range of cognitive domains during a single sleep episode.

show abstract

Section: Cns and Ans Contributions To Long-term Memorymentioning

confidence: 90%

Understanding the roles of central and autonomic activity during sleep in the improvement of working memory and episodic memory

Chen

Zhang

Thayer

et al. 2022

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…That is, in several publications, the authors investigated the different kinds of deception by manipulating the cognitive effort required to lie or by adapting certain paradigms to fit with the research aim, but they did not provide any evidence of the supposed direction of the manipulation but instead just assumed it based on prior studies. Another important limitation raised was the need to test the variables of the study by using a larger pool of measures (Mangiulli et al, 2018(Mangiulli et al, , 2019aPolage, 2018;Paige et al, 2020). In other words, several scholars underlined that multiple measures of the same investigated concept (i.e., memory, physiological, individual differences) should be combined.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research on the Effects of Lying on Memory: A Scientometric Analysis and a Call for New Studies

Battista

Otgaar

2022

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research on the effects of lying and memory is increasingly attracting empirical attention. In the current manuscript, a scientometric analysis was carried out on the mnemonic consequences of lying. This analysis took into account 70 published articles extracted from Scopus and Web of Science databases from 1998 to 2021. A scientometric analysis was conducted in order to visualize the state of the art on this line of research (i.e., authors, countries, institutions, journals, and co-citations). Additionally, a keywords’ cluster analysis was executed to investigate the main keywords used in the published papers. Based on the keywords’ cluster analysis, we identified the main aims and critical issues of the reviewed papers. The United States and the Netherlands are the two most productive countries into the effects of lying on memory. The top five authors are mainly from European countries and wrote from 6 to 15 articles. The cluster analysis detected three clusters of keywords. The critical issues of this line of research are mainly related to the generalizability of the achieved findings for real situations, a lack of a direct control of the manipulation adopted, and a need of additional measures. The current analysis provides a comprehensive overview and understanding of existing research on the effects of lying on memory and provides possible future directions of this research domain.

show abstract

“…Future studies, specifically those including repeated measures, need to control more strictly for those influencing factors, which limit RMSSD as a proxy of vmHRV (de Geus et al, 2019;Stein et al, 2005). For example, the observed heart rate interference might provide an explanation why meta-analyses revealed only small correlations between vmHRV and cognitive control (r = .09, Holzman & Bridgett, 2017;Zahn et al, 2016;r = .15), or why other studies found no robust link between memory retrieval success and HRV measured during cognitive processing (Hilgarter et al, 2021) or vmHRV reactivity at encoding (Paige et al, 2020). vmHRV reactivity and heart rate reactivity showed to be a promising venue to reduce confounder bias which may reveal important insight into the relationship between cardiac vagal control and higher-level cognition.…”

Section: The Psychophysiological Relationship Is Time-variantmentioning

confidence: 99%

Autonomic and cognitive control in memory: Investigating the psychophysiological link using heart rate variability biofeedback

Bögge,

Colás‐Blanco,

Ferragu

et al. 2024

Psychophysiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vagally mediated heart rate variability (vmHRV) at resting state has been associated to cognitive functions dependent on cognitive control, such as memory. However, little is known about the phasic interaction between cognitive and autonomic control. In a pre‐registered within‐between‐subject designed experiment, the potential of vmHRV biofeedback to simultaneously stimulate vmHRV during memory processing and cognitive control over long‐term memory was tested, along with investigating psychophysiological association. 71 young healthy adults completed (twice) a false memory task in virtual reality. Immediately before memory encoding and retrieval, participants practiced either vmHRV biofeedback or a control breathing exercise. Cognitive control over long‐term memory was assessed as the confidence toward false memories and the capability to discriminate them from true memories. Resting‐state vmHRV before each test and phasic vmHRV during memory encoding and retrieval were measured as the root mean square differences (RMSSD) in the heart period. vmHRV biofeedback had neither an immediate effect on measures of cognitive control over long‐term memory nor on phasic RMSSD. Moreover, neither resting‐state nor phasic vmHRV correlated to the cognitive scores. Consequently, the utility of HRV biofeedback as a psychophysiological stimulation tool and a link between vmHRV and cognitive control over long‐term memory could not be verified. Exploratory analyses revealed that baseline shift in parasympathetic activity confounded the psychophysiological association. Future directions are provided that could shed light on the relationship between cognition and vmHRV.

show abstract

Evaluating heart rate variability as a predictor of the influence of lying on memory

Cited by 7 publications

References 67 publications

Understanding the roles of central and autonomic activity during sleep in the improvement of working memory and episodic memory

Understanding the roles of central and autonomic activity during sleep in the improvement of working memory and episodic memory

Research on the Effects of Lying on Memory: A Scientometric Analysis and a Call for New Studies

Autonomic and cognitive control in memory: Investigating the psychophysiological link using heart rate variability biofeedback

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About