2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Hip Labral Tears Using Magnetic Resonance Arthrography: A Prospective Study Comparing Hip Arthroscopy and Magnetic Resonance Arthrography Diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
72
1
11

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
8
72
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to hip arthroscopy as gold standard, d-MRA is reported to have sensitivities of 63-100%, specificities of 44-100% and accuracy values of 65-96%. [50][51][52][53][54][55] For the detection of labral tears, the inter-observer reliability has been reported to be moderate. 50,56 With 2 dimensional in contrast to 3 dimensional MRI techniques, the assessment of thickness and orientation of the acetabular lesion was not optimal.…”
Section: Labrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to hip arthroscopy as gold standard, d-MRA is reported to have sensitivities of 63-100%, specificities of 44-100% and accuracy values of 65-96%. [50][51][52][53][54][55] For the detection of labral tears, the inter-observer reliability has been reported to be moderate. 50,56 With 2 dimensional in contrast to 3 dimensional MRI techniques, the assessment of thickness and orientation of the acetabular lesion was not optimal.…”
Section: Labrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies have assessed the usefulness of radial reformatted images to improve the sensitivity of labral tear detection. Chan et al [22] evaluated 16 patients with suspected labral tear by MR arthrography with radial reformatted images and used the arthroscopic findings as a reference; they demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 96% accuracy. However, more recent work by Yoon et al [23] found no difference in sensitivity in the detection of labral tears between radial reformats and standard MR arthrographic views.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA), in which MRI is enhanced by the intra-articular injection of gadolinium, has become the modality of choice for evaluation. The most recent studies find that MRA has a sensitivity of 93 -100 percent and an accuracy of 93-96 percent [30][31][32]. Metaanalysis supports the superior reliability of MRA to plain MRI, although variability and the use of small datasets were noted [33].…”
Section: Diagnosis and Clinical Presentation Of Labral Tearsmentioning
confidence: 90%