2005
DOI: 10.1093/jjfinec/nbi005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Interest Rate Covariance Models Within a Value-at-Risk Framework

Abstract: We find that covariance matrix forecasts for an international interest rate portfolio generated by a model that incorporates interest-rate level volatility effects perform best with respect to statistical loss functions. However, within a value-at-risk (VaR) framework, the relative performance of the covariance matrix forecasts depends greatly on the VaR distributional assumption. Simple forecasts based just on weighted averages of past observations perform best using a VaR framework. In fact, we find that por… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where lrv ðdÞ t ¼ logðRV p;t Þ is the logarithm of the daily portfolio realized variance defined in Eq (7);…”
Section: Volatility Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where lrv ðdÞ t ¼ logðRV p;t Þ is the logarithm of the daily portfolio realized variance defined in Eq (7);…”
Section: Volatility Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 5 ] suggest that VaR forecast based on the univariate GARCH model is at least as good as the forecasts from the multivariate counterparts within identical innovation distribution families. The complex multivariate models tend to overfit the data [ 7 ]. The relative performance of multivariate volatility in VaR forecasts depends more on the distributional assumptions than on the parametric specification of the volatility models [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where F ´1 α is the critical value from an inverse normal distribution corresponding to the α% level, while ŵi 1 d are the optimized portfolio weights from factor model i on day d (see equation ( 4)), and Σi d is the matrix of day-ahead out-of-sample covariance forecasts from factor model i. We focus on the 1-day VaR as this is a very common choice by academics and practitioners (see, for example, Engle, 2002;Ferreira and Lopez, 2005). 29 We then calculate for each model i, the number of VaR exceedances, often called Hit, as follows…”
Section: Economic Gainsmentioning
confidence: 99%