2019
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-129963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Isatuximab Interference with Monoclonal Protein Detection By Immuno-Capture and Liquid Chromatography Coupled to High Resolution Mass Spectrometry in the Pivotal Phase 3 Multiple Myeloma Trial, Icaria-MM

Abstract: Recent advances in multiple myeloma (MM), have seen the advent of several therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAb) targeting antigens on malignant plasma cells such as CD38 and SLAMF7. Evaluation of depth of response through quantification of M-Protein, by Serum Protein Electrophoresis (SPEP) and Immuno-Fixation Electrophoresis (IFE) presents a particular challenge for clinical laboratories when therapeutic mAbs are used. Specifically, therapeutic mAbs can confound SPEP and IFE measurements when they overlap wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various other assays are being developed for isatuximab since obviously all MoAbs share this ability to interfere. Mass spectrometry has been a successfully used method to distinguish isatuximab from original M-protein [ 79 ].…”
Section: Anti-cd38 Monoclonal Antibodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various other assays are being developed for isatuximab since obviously all MoAbs share this ability to interfere. Mass spectrometry has been a successfully used method to distinguish isatuximab from original M-protein [ 79 ].…”
Section: Anti-cd38 Monoclonal Antibodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a threshold of 250 μg/mL for IFE positivity (sensitivity threshold of IFE test per Covance central lab), 11 out of 22 patients with a very good partial response (VGPR), according to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria for the diagnosis of MM, were identified as having M-protein levels below this threshold; this suggests that true complete response (CR) in the Isa-Pd arm was underestimated by approximately 7% due to interference with isatuximab . Interestingly, M-protein interference mediated by isatuximab, an IgG kappa mAb, was predominantly observed in patients with the IgG isotype (mainly IgG kappa) and in patients in whom a detectable IgG heavy chain could not be identified.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 31, 32 Consequently, more sensitive and specific assays have been introduced to detect M-protein. 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 An isatuximab-specific antibody-capture assay to mitigate M-protein interference on immunofixation is now Conformité Européenne marked in the European Union, US Food and Drug Administration 510(k) approved, 38 and submitted for regulatory clearance in other regions. 39 However, at the time of the interim analysis of the IKEMA study, the isatuximab-specific assay was not available for use; therefore, M-protein interference was analyzed through high-resolution mass spectrometry, preceded by immuno-capture and liquid chromatography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%