1996
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(96)00073-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating kinetic fractionation factors used for reconstructions from oxgen and hydrogen isotope ratios in plant water and cellulose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been suggested that most of the discrepancies between modeled and measured leaf water isotopic compositions could be resolved by careful estimation of the kinetic fractionation factor, ⑀ k (Buhay et al, 1996). As expected from Equation 2, ⑀ k and consequently ⌬ C are sensitive to the boundary layer conductance to water vapor diffusion (g b ), especially at the lower range of g b (Fig.…”
Section: Applying the String-of-lakes Model To Leaves For ⌬ 18 O Leafmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been suggested that most of the discrepancies between modeled and measured leaf water isotopic compositions could be resolved by careful estimation of the kinetic fractionation factor, ⑀ k (Buhay et al, 1996). As expected from Equation 2, ⑀ k and consequently ⌬ C are sensitive to the boundary layer conductance to water vapor diffusion (g b ), especially at the lower range of g b (Fig.…”
Section: Applying the String-of-lakes Model To Leaves For ⌬ 18 O Leafmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An alternative method to calculate ⑀ k is described by Buhay et al (1996), taking leaf size and morphology into consideration. To explain the observation that bulk leaf water is less enriched than that predicted by the CraigGordon model, Leaney et al (1985) described leaf water as consisting of two pools: evaporatively enriched leaf tissue water and isotopically unaltered vascular water (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average value of λ LW−IW (0.519) is close to the value of θ diff calculated for the diffusion of vapor in air (0.518; Barkan and Luz, 2007). As schematically described in Landais et al (2016), λ transp (equivalent to λ LW−IW ) represents the interplay among three processes in the leaf boundary layer: (1) the equilibrium fractionation, which is only temperaturedependent (Majoube, 1971) and drives the isotope composition of leaf water along the equilibrium water line (θ equil = 0.529); (2) the diffusion transport leading to increasing kinetic fractionation with decreasing relative humidity along the diffusion line; (3) the isotope exchange of leaf water with atmospheric water vapor, decreasing from turbulent to laminar and molecular leaf boundary layer vapor transport conditions (e.g., Buhay et al, 1996). In the case of the growth chamber experiment, the fact that λ LW−IW is close to θ diff supports that the increasing diffusion of vapor in air when RH decreases or transpiration increases is the main process controlling the evolution of 17 O-excess LW .…”
Section: Irrigation and Soil Watersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The δ 18 O LW is commonly modelled as a function of the isotope composition of absorbed water, the isotope composition of water vapor, and RH (Craig and Gordon, 1965). The Craig and Gordon simple approach overestimates δ 18 O LW and different corrections have been proposed to take into account the diffusion of the evaporating water back to the leaf lamina and the advection of less evaporated stem water (i.e., the Péclet effect, Buhay et al, 1996;Helliker and Ehleringer, 2000;Roden et al, 2000;Farquhar and Gan, 2003;Farquhar and Cernusak, 2005;Ripullone et al, 2008;Treydte et al, 2014). In the growth chamber experiment, where water availability, relative humidity, and temperature were kept constant, we assume that transpiration rapidly reached a steady state and that the isotope composition of transpired water was the same as that of the irrigation water entering the plant (e.g., Welp et al, 2008 (2000) proposed, for monocotyledonous species characterized by a vertical parallel veinal structure, to use instead of the Craig and Gordon model the Gat and Bowser (1991) Table S3 was either higher or lower than the observed 17 O-excess e LW−IW .…”
Section: Irrigation and Soil Watersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term e k was calculated using equations from Appendix C of Buhay, Edwards & Aravena (1996), accounting for dissected leaf morphology, and incorporating on-site measurements of mean late-morning wind speed. The kinetic fractionation factor used was the revised value for oxygen isotopomers of water from Cappa et al (2003).…”
Section: Assessing the Péclet Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%