Evaluating Knowledge, Evaluating Character: Book Reviewing by American Historians and Physicists (1900–1940)

It is well known that research quality notions vary across research fields. Despite this, humanities quality notions are often portrayed as deviant or particularly hard to grasp. To some extent, this has a historical explanation, as notions from within the humanities have not been the standards used in the development of research evaluation tools. Accordingly, we argue that current discussions on research evaluation and quality notions reflect a lack of understanding of how field-type quality notions in the humanities can be studied. We therefore identify entry points to further studies on how humanities scholars address quality notions in their own words, what one might call ‘quality from within’. The suggested entry points are assessment for recruitment, field-type internal evaluations, public debates on the humanities, book reviews, the academic seminar, PhD supervision, academic memoirs, obituaries and the Festschrift. We here outline how an empirically grounded research agenda around quality in humanities research can be fruitfully pursued. Thus, the study aims to contribute insights into why and how a fresh perspective can provide us with much-needed entry points to understanding quality from within.

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Evaluating Knowledge, Evaluating Character: Book Reviewing by American Historians and Physicists (1900–1940)

Abstract: for inspiring discussions and valuable feedback on previous versions of this article. Further, I am grateful for helpful comments provided by two reviewers.1. On (the reception of ) Eisenschiml's book, see Hanchett, "Historian as Gamesman."

Cited by 3 publications

References 61 publications

A smorgasbord of print: the development of scholarly publishing in the Swedish humanities, c. 1840–1880

A smorgasbord of print: the development of scholarly publishing in the Swedish humanities, c. 1840–1880

How Diverse Is the History of the Humanities and Does It Matter?

Quality from within: Entry points to research quality in the humanities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About