2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2106.03985
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating low-depth quantum algorithms for time evolution on fermion-boson systems

Nathan Fitzpatrick,
Harriet Apel,
David Muñoz Ramo

Abstract: Simulating time evolution of quantum systems is one of the most promising applications of quantum computing and also appears as a subroutine in many applications such as Green's function methods. In the current era of NISQ machines we assess the state of algorithms for simulating time dynamics with limited resources. We propose the Jaynes-Cummings model and extensions to it as useful toy models to investigate time evolution algorithms on near-term quantum computers. Using these simple models, direct Trotterisa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike their fermionic counterparts, quantum manybody systems involving bosonic constituents have infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces that ought to be truncated if one aims to simulate such systems on either classical or quantum computers. Due to the inherently nontrivial problem of encoding bosonic states on qubit registers, digital simulators of systems involving bosonic particles have heretofore received comparatively modest at- * Electronic address: vladimir.stojanovic@physik.tu-darmstadt.de tention [20][21][22][23][24][25]. In particular, while a multitude of analog simulators of coupled fermion-boson models [20,26] have been proposed [27][28][29][30][31][32][33], only a handful of such models have as yet been addressed in the DQS context [21,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike their fermionic counterparts, quantum manybody systems involving bosonic constituents have infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces that ought to be truncated if one aims to simulate such systems on either classical or quantum computers. Due to the inherently nontrivial problem of encoding bosonic states on qubit registers, digital simulators of systems involving bosonic particles have heretofore received comparatively modest at- * Electronic address: vladimir.stojanovic@physik.tu-darmstadt.de tention [20][21][22][23][24][25]. In particular, while a multitude of analog simulators of coupled fermion-boson models [20,26] have been proposed [27][28][29][30][31][32][33], only a handful of such models have as yet been addressed in the DQS context [21,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the initial state is |0 ⊗n , as is convention for quantum algorithms, then the problem can be solved with ISL [34]. In ISL, the structure of V † is informed by incrementally adding gates that work to disentangle the original circuit back to the |0 ⊗n state, leading to significant gate count reductions [51] particularly for Trotterised time evolution circuits [52]. More details of ISL can be found in [34].…”
Section: Real Device Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the initial state is 0⟩ ⊗ n , as is convention for quantum algorithms, then the problem can be solved with incremental structural learning (ISL) [35]. In ISL, the structure of V † is informed by incrementally adding gates that work to disentangle the original circuit back to the 0⟩ ⊗ n state, leading to significant gate count reductions [50] particularly for Trotterised time evolution circuits [51]. More details of ISL can be found in [35].…”
Section: Real Device Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, ISL can be considered as a method for substituting circuit depth for increased circuit evaluations, such that obtaining the population at a given time requires O(kn e ) rather than O(k) evaluations, where k is the number of shots and n e is the number of evaluations required for convergence of ISL. Analysis of how the value of n e changes for different systems is an ongoing effort [51,52], however across this work it ranges from ∼ 10 1 to ∼ 10 4 depending on the complexity and depth of the circuit.…”
Section: Real Device Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%