2020 23rd International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iccit51783.2020.9392662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Machine Learning Algorithms For Bengali Fake News Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two feature extraction methods and six supervised ML classification methods were also compared in this study. The combination of the TF-IDF feature extraction method and the Linear Support Vector Machine (LSVM) classifier achieves the highest accuracy of 92%.The authors of the study [31] identify bogus news using a Gaussian Naïve Bayes classifier. They collected data from Facebook and various other sources to implement their methodology and achieved 87% accuracy.…”
Section: Role Of Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two feature extraction methods and six supervised ML classification methods were also compared in this study. The combination of the TF-IDF feature extraction method and the Linear Support Vector Machine (LSVM) classifier achieves the highest accuracy of 92%.The authors of the study [31] identify bogus news using a Gaussian Naïve Bayes classifier. They collected data from Facebook and various other sources to implement their methodology and achieved 87% accuracy.…”
Section: Role Of Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IDF has a process that gives less weight to words that appear more often in a group of text and more weight to words that appear less often. As in the equation (2).…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fake news hurt people's minds, which makes them read less trustworthy news. This kind of false news is spread by people who want to make money from the number of views on their page or by giving a biased opinion to trick people into making a different choice, like during an election [2]. Fake news spreads faster than real news because it is more interesting to the viewer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other techniques using machine learning are widely implemented to detect, classify, and predict misinformation. A model created by [86] proposed a stochastic gradient descent technique with 87% accuracy. Moreover, another paper by [87] used 23 machine learning techniques such as BayesNet, JRip, OneR, decision stump, ZeroR, stochastic gradient descent (SGD), CV parameter selection (CVPS), randomizable filtered classifier (RFC), logistic model tree (LMT), locally weighted learning (LWL), classification via clustering (CvC), weighted instances handler wrapper (WIHW), ridor, multi-layer perceptron (MLP), ordinal learning model (OLM), simple cart, attribute selected classifier (ASC), J48, sequential minimal optimization (SMO), bagging, decision tree, IBk, and kernel logistic regression (KLR) to detect fake news in social media.…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%