2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40670-019-00761-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Medical Students’ Clinical Reasoning in Psychiatry Using Clinical and Basic Science Concepts Presented in Session-level Integration Sessions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of the interventions on pre-clinical students’ clinical reasoning development was assessed through students’ course feedback, script concordance test, course or national exams, history taking method, illness script richness and maturity, diagnostic performance, written illness script analysis, clinical assessment with standardized patients (SPs), and knowledge development ( Table 1 ). Six studies found that their intervention was effective in developing pre-clinical students’ diagnostic reasoning [ 4 , 10 , 22 - 25 ]. Two studies investigated only students’ responses and reported very positive responses [ 1 , 26 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The effect of the interventions on pre-clinical students’ clinical reasoning development was assessed through students’ course feedback, script concordance test, course or national exams, history taking method, illness script richness and maturity, diagnostic performance, written illness script analysis, clinical assessment with standardized patients (SPs), and knowledge development ( Table 1 ). Six studies found that their intervention was effective in developing pre-clinical students’ diagnostic reasoning [ 4 , 10 , 22 - 25 ]. Two studies investigated only students’ responses and reported very positive responses [ 1 , 26 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategies include three categories: learning and teaching settings, contents, and methods. First, regarding learning and teaching settings, five studies used small group settings to encourage the discussion among the group of students with their facilitators [ 1 , 4 , 10 , 23 , 26 ]. The focus of the programs for developing students’ illness scripts should be on tuning and restructuring previously acquired knowledge instead of acquiring new knowledge for use in clinical contexts [ 10 , 26 , 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations