Evaluating Methods for Estimating Existential Risks

Abstract

Researchers and commissions contend that the risk of human extinction is high, but none of these estimates have been based upon a rigorous methodology suitable for estimating existential risks. This article evaluates several methods that could be used to estimate the probability of human extinction. Traditional methods evaluated include: simple elicitation; whole evidence Bayesian; evidential reasoning using imprecise probabilities; and Bayesian networks. Three innovative methods are also considered: influence modeling based on environmental scans; simple elicitation using extinction scenarios as anchors; and computationally intensive possible-worlds modeling. Evaluation criteria include: level of effort required by the probability assessors; level of effort needed to implement the method; ability of each method to model the human extinction event; ability to incorporate scientific estimates of contributory events; transparency of the inputs and outputs; acceptability to the academic community (e.g., with respect to intellectual soundness, familiarity, verisimilitude); credibility and utility of the outputs of the method to the policy community; difficulty of communicating the method's processes and outputs to nonexperts; and accuracy in other contexts. The article concludes by recommending that researchers assess the risks of human extinction by combining these methods.

Willow pond: A decentralized low-carbon future scenario

“…On the other hand, a scenario could describe plausible potential future worlds that are relatively insensitive to changes in key parameters [3].…”

“…Using this real-time data in combination with household member preferences, the home computer manages the production, storage, and consumption of energy. 3 The home HVAC 'system' meshes passive thermal radiation, hydroponic heating, and vented and unvented air systems to provide comfort in the winter. The integrated system's peak output is 5 kilowatt (kW), with an annual production of 50 megawatt hours (MWh), equivalent.…”

Defence in Depth Against Human Extinction: Prevention, Response, Resilience, and Why They All Matter

“…Human extinction is also possible, even this century. Both the total risk of extinction by 2100 and the probabilities of specific potential causes have been estimated using a variety of methods including trend extrapolation, mathematical modelling, and expert elicitation; see Rowe and Beard () for a review, as well as Tonn and Stiefel () for methodological recommendations. For example, Pamlin and Armstrong () give probabilities between 0.00003% and 5% for different scenarios that could eventually cause irreversible civilisational collapse.…”

Bridging the Gap between the Technological Singularity and Mainstream Medicine: Highlighting a Course on Technology and the Future of Medicine

“…It could lead to a utopian post-scarcity world in which disease has been essentially eliminated, and human beings have everything they want and need ( Diamandis, 2012) . Or it could lead to enormous catastrophic global suffering and loss of life and possibly mark the end of humanity ( Tonn & Stiefel, 2013 ). With knowledge and foresight, it may be possible to shift the impact of the technological singularity to a positive outcome.…”