2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.06.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating morphological variability in lithic assemblages using 3D models of stone artifacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other drawbacks in applying these results to the archaeological record include the feasibility of scanning and land-marking large archaeological collections at this point in time. However, the efficiency of scanning technologies and the availability of digital methodologies for landmarking stone artefacts have both increased at an exponential rate within just the last 5 to 6 years (Bretzke and Conard 2012;Grosman 2016;Morales et al 2015). Applying these newly available digital tools to wider ranges of experimental as well as archaeological flake collections and in pursuit of tackling more complex questions about the technological behaviour of past hominins comprise exciting new avenues of this research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other drawbacks in applying these results to the archaeological record include the feasibility of scanning and land-marking large archaeological collections at this point in time. However, the efficiency of scanning technologies and the availability of digital methodologies for landmarking stone artefacts have both increased at an exponential rate within just the last 5 to 6 years (Bretzke and Conard 2012;Grosman 2016;Morales et al 2015). Applying these newly available digital tools to wider ranges of experimental as well as archaeological flake collections and in pursuit of tackling more complex questions about the technological behaviour of past hominins comprise exciting new avenues of this research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, morphometric analysis provides data for the study of production technologies. Such methods are increasingly common, especially in studies of lithics (Bretzke and Conard 2012;Clarkson 2013;Grosman et al 2008;Lin et al 2010;Lycett and von Cramon-Taubadel 2013;Lycett et al 2010;Sholts et al 2012). Morphometric analyses of ceramics, too, have become common, in comparing shapes using either 2D profile drawings that presuppose wheelmade rotational symmetry (Gilboa et al 2004;Smilansky 2008, 2011;Grosman et al 2014) or simplified representations of 3D objects (Selden et al 2014).…”
Section: Back To the Third Dimension In Archaeological Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research efforts are increasingly focused on the measurement and 3D documentation of medium and small archaeological finds, such as to study the technological and morphological variability of artefacts (Bretzke & Conard, 2012) and to create accurate models in a time-and resource-efficient manner (Olson et al, 2013). The study of ancient pottery is a crucial phase in the archaeological interpretation, from different points of view, as for example the chronological or cultural aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%