2018
DOI: 10.5194/bg-2018-422
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating multi-year, multi-site data on the energy balance closure of eddy-covariance flux measurements at cropland sites in southwest Germany

Abstract: <p><strong>Abstract.</strong> The energy balance of eddy covariance (EC) measurements is typically not closed. This so-called energy balance closure (EBC) problem has been a long-standing issue in micrometeorology. It is a main challenge in evaluating and interpreting EC flux data. EBC is crucial for validating and improving regional and global climate models. To investigate the reasons behind EBC more closely for agro-ecosystems, we analysed EC measurements from two c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eddy-Covariance measurements are known for a gap in the energy balance closure (EBC): the sum of H and λET is frequently about 15 to 30% smaller than Rn -Sl -Ec [58,64]. Current theory suggests a number of different reasons including underestimation of the turbulent heat fluxes due to surface heterogeneity or incomplete correction of spectral losses, or unaccounted energy storage [64][65][66][67][68]. However, there is no consensus yet on the application of a correction, its distribution between H and λET and its implications for Ec [69,70].…”
Section: (B) Energy Balance Closurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eddy-Covariance measurements are known for a gap in the energy balance closure (EBC): the sum of H and λET is frequently about 15 to 30% smaller than Rn -Sl -Ec [58,64]. Current theory suggests a number of different reasons including underestimation of the turbulent heat fluxes due to surface heterogeneity or incomplete correction of spectral losses, or unaccounted energy storage [64][65][66][67][68]. However, there is no consensus yet on the application of a correction, its distribution between H and λET and its implications for Ec [69,70].…”
Section: (B) Energy Balance Closurementioning
confidence: 99%