1996
DOI: 10.1161/01.str.27.5.858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Neuroprotective Agents for Clinical Anti-Ischemic Benefit Using Neurological and Neuropsychological Changes After Cardiac Surgery Under Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Abstract: The strokelike cerebral dysfunction (maximal acutely, with eventual recovery) that occurs after CS-CPB is useful to screen NPAs for clinical efficacy. CCSs based on detailed neurological examination and neuropsychological testing are sensitive measures; refinement of this approach should enhance the efficiency of the CS-CPB model. Further testing of GM1 is warranted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method of handling the data is, however, considered to be insensitive, because it applies a conventional but arbitrary cut-off and ignores any improvements in performance. 8,13 We have argued elsewhere 13 that studies of interventions in cardiac surgery designed to improve outcome that include 2 or more patient groups should use all the data by comparing the change in performance between the 2 groups. This not only enables an examination to be made of each of the tests, as some may be more sensitive to change than others, but, crucially, also allows the potential effects of learning to be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method of handling the data is, however, considered to be insensitive, because it applies a conventional but arbitrary cut-off and ignores any improvements in performance. 8,13 We have argued elsewhere 13 that studies of interventions in cardiac surgery designed to improve outcome that include 2 or more patient groups should use all the data by comparing the change in performance between the 2 groups. This not only enables an examination to be made of each of the tests, as some may be more sensitive to change than others, but, crucially, also allows the potential effects of learning to be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grieco et al 8 recently reported a pilot study using GM1 ganglioside in 18 patients undergoing bypass surgery, with 11 patients on placebo. No statistically significant differences were detectable, and a sample size of 150 was estimated to be needed to confirm or reject a nonstatistically significant treatment benefit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of cardiac surgery and studies that attempt to protect the brain, preservation learning as indicated by an improvement in the neuropsychological test performance may be considered to reflect the protection of the brain during surgery (see Arrowsmith and colleagues7). The use of score change takes account of both potential preserved learning ability and potential deterioration on the tests providing a sensitive tool for the assessment of interventions in cardiac surgery (see also Grieco and colleagues8). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1-7 Because it leads to brain changes, cardiac surgery has been proposed as a model to screen potential neuroprotective agents, particularly when DWI is used to identify incident lesions. 2, 8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%