2012
DOI: 10.1080/21551197.2012.647555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Nutrition Risk Factors and Other Determinants of Use of an Urban Congregate Meal Program by Older African Americans

Abstract: Rapid growth in both the number of older U.S. adults and diversity in the population suggests increased and disparate demands for nutrition services. Funded by the Older Americans Act (OAA), the primary purpose of congregate meal services is to keep older Americans nutritionally secure and living independently in the community. Understanding characteristics that influence older African Americans' use of congregate meal services is important for development of culturally sensitive networks and program policies.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal of OAA is to reach older adults with food insecurity, yet there are instances of inequity among some communities. Weddle and colleagues [ 22 ] reported that, for community-dwelling, older African Americans, nutrition risk was higher among nonparticipants compared to participants of congregate meal services. Home-delivered meals improved dietary status and reduced food insecurity of recipients in 6 out of 8 studies, according to a systematic review [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of OAA is to reach older adults with food insecurity, yet there are instances of inequity among some communities. Weddle and colleagues [ 22 ] reported that, for community-dwelling, older African Americans, nutrition risk was higher among nonparticipants compared to participants of congregate meal services. Home-delivered meals improved dietary status and reduced food insecurity of recipients in 6 out of 8 studies, according to a systematic review [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All four studies found that persons living alone were more likely than other groups to use these services. [71][72][73][74] Challenges in acquiring and preparing food could also contribute to the lower diversity in food intake seen in persons living alone.…”
Section: Socioeconomic Factors and Living Alonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirteen studies included in this review reported on a non-randomized intervention involving home-delivered meals (73, 74,75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85). Most of these involved tweaking or adding something different to existing home-delivered meals programs; these included: adding snacks (73), allowing food choices (74), receiving nutrition education (75), receiving meals post-hospital discharge (76, 78), adding breakfast (79), providing “heart healthy” meals and education (81), adding more meals and snacks (80), taking homebound older adults out to eat (82), adding dietary supplements (84), and providing frozen meals (85).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these involved tweaking or adding something different to existing home-delivered meals programs; these included: adding snacks (73), allowing food choices (74), receiving nutrition education (75), receiving meals post-hospital discharge (76, 78), adding breakfast (79), providing “heart healthy” meals and education (81), adding more meals and snacks (80), taking homebound older adults out to eat (82), adding dietary supplements (84), and providing frozen meals (85). Some studies were single group designs, while others had a comparison group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%