2015
DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2015.1114991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating patterns in retention, continuation, gaps, and re-engagement in HIV care in a Medicaid-insured population, 2006–2012, United States

Abstract: We used the US-based MarketScan® Medicaid Multi-state Databases to determine the un-weighted proportion of publically insured persons with HIV that were retained, continued, and re-engaged in care. Persons were followed for up to 84 months. Cox proportional hazards models were conducted to determine factors associated with gaps in care. Of the 6463 HIV cases identified in 2006, 61% were retained during the first 24 months, and 53% continued in care through 78 months. Between 8% and 30% experienced a gap in car… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; 2) two-year retention: did the participant attend at least one visit in each of the four 6-month blocks during the two years? ; and 3) one-year retention: did the participant attend at least one visit in three or four of the four quarter-years during the one year before enrollment[ 17 19 ]? Finally, to summarize the retention data, we created a single variable representing poor retention in care in which participants meeting any of the three measures of poor retention were considered to have some evidence of poor retention in the past 2 years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; 2) two-year retention: did the participant attend at least one visit in each of the four 6-month blocks during the two years? ; and 3) one-year retention: did the participant attend at least one visit in three or four of the four quarter-years during the one year before enrollment[ 17 19 ]? Finally, to summarize the retention data, we created a single variable representing poor retention in care in which participants meeting any of the three measures of poor retention were considered to have some evidence of poor retention in the past 2 years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other estimates of retention in HIV care, from clinical or administrative claims data, which typically examine 1 or 2 years of follow-up data, range from 59% to 82%, although most of these studies have not accounted for the dynamic movement into and out of care (i.e., reengagement in care). 4,1621 In a previous report of a Medicaid-insured population, from 2006 to 2012, retention in HIV care over the initial 24 months of observation was 61%, subsequent retention in HIV care at 84 months was 53%, and between 8% and 30% of persons experienced a gap in HIV care of more than 6 months. 21 The substantial proportion of persons who fall out of care or experience gaps in care have public health implications because ~60% of new HIV infections are transmitted from persons who are HIV diagnosed, but not fully retained in medical care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,1621 In a previous report of a Medicaid-insured population, from 2006 to 2012, retention in HIV care over the initial 24 months of observation was 61%, subsequent retention in HIV care at 84 months was 53%, and between 8% and 30% of persons experienced a gap in HIV care of more than 6 months. 21 The substantial proportion of persons who fall out of care or experience gaps in care have public health implications because ~60% of new HIV infections are transmitted from persons who are HIV diagnosed, but not fully retained in medical care. 22 In this report, we provide estimates of persons who experience gaps in care and then reengage in care over a period of 60 months, as well as factors associated with time to a gap in care and time to reengagement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2 recent studies in the United States of publicly and commercially insured persons with HIV, up to 30% experienced gaps in care. 5,6 Although persons who have gaps in care are considered to be out of care, it is conceivable that some of these individuals continue to fill ARV drug prescriptions, during the gap, and could reach viral suppression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%