2018
DOI: 10.3390/rs10020313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Precipitation Estimates from Eta, TRMM and CHRIPS Data in the South-Southeast Region of Minas Gerais State—Brazil

Abstract: Precipitation estimates derived from the Eta model and from TRMM (Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission) and CHIRPS (Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data) remotely sensed data were compared to the precipitation data of the INMET (National Institute of Meteorology) meteorological stations in the south-southeast region of Minas Gerais state, Brazil, in the period between July 2009 and June 2015. Then, information about evapotranspiration (ETR), water deficit (DEF), and water surplus (EXC)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
23
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The good performance of TRMM is also shown in other recent studies that used TRMM datasets worldwide [59,60]. However, the good results achieved with PERSIANN grid in [8] are not found in the present study, due to various and extreme climatic conditions which characterize Spain, as in the case of complex topography in Chile shown by Zambrano-Bigiarini et al [61].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The good performance of TRMM is also shown in other recent studies that used TRMM datasets worldwide [59,60]. However, the good results achieved with PERSIANN grid in [8] are not found in the present study, due to various and extreme climatic conditions which characterize Spain, as in the case of complex topography in Chile shown by Zambrano-Bigiarini et al [61].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…As expected, the value and size of these changes depend on the smoothing parameter. The larger this parameter, the smoother the impact in spatial coverage is and the smaller the deviations from the analysis are [21]. Matching the radar resolution to that of the model should minimize numerical effects while focusing on physical features.…”
Section: Results Of Radar Data Assimilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, the value and size of these changes depend on the smoothing parameter. The larger this parameter, the smoother the impact in spatial coverage is and the smaller the deviations from the analysis are [17]. Matching the radar resolution to that of the model, should minimize numerical effects, while focusing on physical features.…”
Section: Results Of Radar Data Assimilationmentioning
confidence: 99%